Girl gets pulled in a half.

Mitchell115 · 2012-05-25T09:47:09.142429+00:00

TADA!

haddock420 · 1 day

Yeah, viewers are still an audience. He is tricking the people participating in the illusion/trick and there is no reason why he would not trick the audience watching his show as well. Regardless a lot of what he says/explains is true. Like the one episode he gives everyone the same horoscope reading.

DzNDaBeat · 1 day

Police is not a race.

lfernandes · 4 days

It's not that I rebelled, it's was just a matter of it making sense or not. When you ask a question like "How is God not responsible for evil, if everything comes from God?", and you only get deflections like "God works in mysterious ways" along with the implecation that you are doing something bad by questioning him, I had to ask myself if that's an attempt on religion's part to suppress any conflicting ideas. Science will never make a statement like "that phenomenon behaves like this because it works in mysterious ways". Furthermore, science will never try to prove something by suppressing any doubts about what its trying to prove. It is also good to note science and religion are not opposites. Science is more of a tool, religion is an idea embedded into cultures that have many social and cultural impacts.

lfernandes · 5 days

This very unfalsifiable nature of christianity is what made me doubt it. It's as if a dictator of a military government decides to randomly kill people and justifies it by saying "if you doubt in my decision making we will never make this country better". Then if people are gullible they will weep over the dead while lying to themselves that it's for the greater good of the country. If an idea states that proving it wrong is evidence that it's right, that idea is unfalsifiable and therefore probably not a good idea.

staccato_spurts · 8 days

Yet, if neither of them had down syndrome nobody would care.

Leonsguns · 10 days

so when you tell someone to stop doing something you're doing it too?

ump721 · 10 days

Yeah a gateway error is indeed relevant right now.

thesystemx · 11 days

the implication is that you could be the only programmer or part of a small team that manages a huge outsourcing team.

Khephran · 12 days

that is fucked up son. upvote

streeter5000 · 15 days

Except people were more racist back then.

pheret1 · 15 days

If he really did it because the victim was gay, then that's pretty much a hate crime. Unlike what you're saying, most people would not go there, not to mention he is running for president which most people are not.

Leap20 · 16 days

My point is you can't justify something based on its legality. Many legal things should be illegal, and vice versa.

im4keitr4in · 17 days

...and the facts don't matter

Leap20 · 17 days

Guess what, back in the day, slavery was in fact legal.

noctal · 17 days

I think the argument boils down to whether skills and abilities are part of your character or not. Why not be able to switch classes at any time and transfer all your skill points? Why force people to play 70+ hours again if they just want to try the sorceress instead of the barbarian? How much should the player commit to? In my opinion, high commitment yields the most rewarding gameplay experience, since you are risking more and others are as well.

noctal · 18 days

In Diablo 2, you can't respec your talents. Just think about that for a minute. If you spend a talent point wrong once, you have start over your entire character.

I never understood why this is a problem. Is that too hard to do? Create another character and play again? If I recall, you could rush D2 in a couple hours or less. Even if it was a pain in the ass to create a new character in order to make a new build, isn't that part of the challenge?

His analogy of not being able to switch characters in a fighting game is actually flawed and works against the article's point. You can't switch fighters (analogous to a build) in the middle of a fight! You have to start the fight all over again. In some fighting games you can't even switch fighters in story mode--guess what... you have to start all over in order to play with someone else. There seems to be a trend in RPGs where the player doesn't need to commit to anything anymore. What's wrong with committing to a build?

noctal · 18 days

You do but it isn't as important as before, since there are no real repercussions to choosing.

noctal · 18 days

I'm with you. There's basically no repercussion to choosing the wrong skill, therefore no need to stop and think what you're going to build. You just choose whatever skill, try it out, and if you don't like it try something else. This is more akin to an action game where you have a menu with all your weapons, rather than an RPG where deciding what skill you have is important.

Ben_Ben · 20 days

There's an r/AWWWTF

Alexander_Penn · 20 days

I like the idea of having a wife and many concubines. It's sexist and immoral but I still like it.

Alexander_Penn · 20 days

You're thinking of Paul's letter to the Corinthians. It's in either Cor 1 or Cor 2, and he's addressing the people at this church

Cameronisftw · 21 days

Yep, makes sense. In it's in female's best interest to lure and keep the male, hence the change in behavior after marriage, since females need support until the offspring become independent. For males, it is in their best interest (form a reproductive POV) to keep having sex and continue procreating.

curiousManWithQ · 21 days

I'm still looking for a female reply!!!!

mwilcox · 22 days

It's apparently still in beta, so that could be why?

joeblessyou

TROPHY CASE

joeblessyou

TROPHY CASE

you'll need to login or register to do that

create a new account

login