SenJunkieEinstein

- friends
3,653 link karma
5,622 comment karma
send messageredditor for
what's this?

TROPHY CASE


  • Two-Year Club

    Verified Email

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own!

We should start using these to trigger false positives in every drug checkpoint in the country... You mad K9 doggy? :P by Experiment627in trees

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 0 points1 point ago

but if WE are the ones doing it, surely they aren't going to find "nothing every single time"

Youth culture forever! by instant_humanin adventuretime

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 0 points1 point ago

tineye says it is from stomachofanger.com but it doesn't look like it's for sale any more.

If only I had the courage... by HurricaneWeaselin gifs

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 0 points1 point ago

I guess nowadays, Americans don't find anything funny unless it has some sort of pop culture reference in it. LOL LIKE KIM KARDASHIANS BOOTY, AMIRITE GUIZE?

I definitely prefered the original East Coast ending, myself.

Look what I got for a dollar! by DrBloodin filmnoir

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 0 points1 point ago

For a second there I thought it was shopped on!

First Trailer for "Elementary" ...what do you guys think? by leavesoflorienin Holmes

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 3 points4 points ago

I find it off putting, and I don't think I would at all if they had just changed the names. Plenty of detective shows and movies have been recasting holmes and watson in a variety of roles and changing the name. but sherlock holmes and joan watson in manhattan set it modern times.....

and it forces you to compare it to Sherlock of course. But then again most people who see this show will have never have heard of Sherlock.

Dear Geico, these commercials are fucking stupid. by pibsktmpballin pics

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 1 point2 points ago

I'm so glad I don't have cable any more.

Dear Geico, these commercials are fucking stupid. by pibsktmpballin pics

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 0 points1 point ago

Their commercials have turned more people OFF to buying their product than otherwise.

Factually false. Quite simply, in the 12 years since they have started running their national ads they have more than doubled their number of policyholders. If the adverts were turning away customers, Geico would know that better than anyone and they would have stopped with this style of advertising a long time ago.

But the ads haven't stopped, because, contrary to your assumptions and personal experience, they are quite successful. You can debate all you want about why or why not they are successful, but you can't deny that they are.

Dear Geico, these commercials are fucking stupid. by pibsktmpballin pics

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 0 points1 point ago

Do you think the posts pointing out how stupid their ads are on reddit are getting upvoted by dummy bot accounts?

It's possible, but I doubt neccesary, I'm sure reddit's user base has enoguh people who are genuinely annoyed by Geico's commercials to chime in and say so.

Dear Geico, these commercials are fucking stupid. by pibsktmpballin pics

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 0 points1 point ago

I don't get it, that seems like an unusually generic commerical for Geico. I can't figure out what you are getting worked up about it for.

Dear Geico, these commercials are fucking stupid. by pibsktmpballin pics

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 1 point2 points ago

Here we all are, all talking about Geico. Not that stupid is it.

What is this called in French? I look like an idiot by keep saying "ca" and pointing to it. by brian_c94in france

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 0 points1 point ago

of course they have names, how would they be able to reorder them when they run out?

Create lag on a system via commandline by Ihasnin commandline

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 5 points6 points ago

hehehe I was just gonna say "so I can pretend I live in rural alaska again" :p

Bottle Models - Periodic Table of Videos by luisbrudnain chemistry

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 0 points1 point ago

wow these are brilliant.

There's something surprisingly abnormal about Shia Le Bouef. by michaelsamcarrin WTF

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 24 points25 points ago

Opposite Day! LOL

I decided I only had room for one kind of smoke in my life, wish me luck guys! by mrteapoonin trees

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 0 points1 point ago

Smoking weed and cigs together is worse than smoking either by itself.

Weed smoke is hardly good stuff to have in your lungs, it is full of nasty nasty stuff, but a healthy set of lungs can take care of it no problem. That's why when you smoke a lot of weed, you cough up a lot of phlegm, that's your lungs doing it's job.

This is primarily a function of the cilia in the trachea, the little hairs, that accomplishes this. Now here's the kicker, nicotine puts the cilia to sleep basically, severely limiting your lung's ability to get rid of the tars you get from smoking any sort of vegetable matter (yes, even lettuce). That's why a cigarette smoker's cough is an unproductive and shallow one compared to the weed smokers heavy and productive cough.

By smoking cigarettes on top of weed you rob your body's ability to rid itself of the nastyness that you get from both and at that point when someone says "smoking weed is harmless", that doesn't apply to you, because that sort of adage is only applicable to those weed smokers with healthy lungs. Weed smoke is very potentially harmful (just how harmful is difficult to say because studying weed and it's effects has been very difficult due to the nature of the political environment that determines this sort of stuff, but we can make generalizations about smoke in general. some of the most harmful carbon molecules that result after a fire are also some of the most simple and any kind of smoke from burning plant material is going to be full of that kind of stuff)

So by quiting cigarettes you are doing a Very Good Thing. you should start to feel better immediately, even sooner if you cut down on how much weed you smoke (i know, i know, it's the worse time to do it!) to let your lungs catch up.

A question about arrested development on netflix by Wes1180in arresteddevelopment

[–]SenJunkieEinstein -1 points0 points ago

Those aren't spoilers!! Those are the reveals themselves!!

A question about arrested development on netflix by Wes1180in arresteddevelopment

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 2 points3 points ago

Don't worry, the "next time on..." catches most every first time viewer off guard and it takes a while for it to sink in what they are doing :p Yet one more reason why the show is even better the second time around :)

TIL in 2003 a German citizen, whose name is similar to that of a terrorist, was captured by the CIA while traveling on a vacation, then tortured and raped in detention. by onlypostwhenmadin todayilearned

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 0 points1 point ago

Its called inference, and its part of basic logical reasoning.

Yes, it is quite easy to "infer" most anything if one fails to take the time to learn how these things work. Depending on what you assume to be true such inferences can go either way. Instead of talking about what you have infered, let's talk about what you are assuming to be true, i.e. what you believe to be proof.

What proof would you like?

whatever concrete proof that convinced you. Let's get beyond simplistic ideas like "Obama controls the military"

I think maybe Obama's mistake was including the provision in the executive order that read "This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations."

OBVIOUSLY it should have read "This order shall be implemented even if it is NOT consistent with applicable law and even if the appropriations to carry out the order it aren't available, JUST DO IT FOR FREE THIS ONCE OKAY, YOU ARMY GUYS ARE SMART, YOU'LL FIGURE OUT HOW."

TIL in 2003 a German citizen, whose name is similar to that of a terrorist, was captured by the CIA while traveling on a vacation, then tortured and raped in detention. by onlypostwhenmadin todayilearned

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 1 point2 points ago

The military has the money to close gitmo, the president has control of the military, the president hasn't closed gitmo, therefore he doesn't care enough to do it despite having the power to.

And you have no idea what you are talking about, which is why you won't produce any actual proof.

Chick-Fil-A is closed on Sundays. by realist70in firstworldproblems

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 2 points3 points ago

How else am I going to know its sunday?

TIL in 2003 a German citizen, whose name is similar to that of a terrorist, was captured by the CIA while traveling on a vacation, then tortured and raped in detention. by onlypostwhenmadin todayilearned

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 2 points3 points ago

How about instead of me admitting I'm wrong, why don't you post some proof to your simplistic explanation that he simply "doesn't care"?

I hate getting assigned to shoot baseball, so I decided to mess around instead. by jib661in pics

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 1 point2 points ago

What is shocking is the number of people who don't realise the function of holding the shutter button down half-way, or that that function even exists.

I hate getting assigned to shoot baseball, so I decided to mess around instead. by jib661in pics

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 0 points1 point ago

One of the secrets to good photography is to take a LOT of pictures!

I like the subtle pattern that the chainlink fence or netting produced in the bokeh.

TIL in 2003 a German citizen, whose name is similar to that of a terrorist, was captured by the CIA while traveling on a vacation, then tortured and raped in detention. by onlypostwhenmadin todayilearned

[–]SenJunkieEinstein 1 point2 points ago

That's completely incorrect. The prisoners could be moved to another prison. Why not? We've got plenty of them.

Cool, you gonna chip in the funds to do that? Because Congress won't, but for some reason you want to blame that on Obama instead of congress. It doesn't matter how cheap it is to close gitmo if congress is literally paying ZERO dollars to do it.

Gitmo falls under the military, which has the highest budget of any U.S. department

Meaningless if Obama doesn't get to tell that department what to do with it's money.

view more: next