PierceHarlan

- friends
21,681 link karma
7,298 comment karma
send messageredditor for
what's this?

TROPHY CASE


  • Three-Year Club

    ComboLinker
    2011-01-25

    Bellwether
    2011-01-25

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own!

Male Privilege. by Seacrest_Hulkin MensRights

[–]PierceHarlan 0 points1 point ago

Why not just draft the men and women, at any age, who are the strongest and the fastest and leave the rest alone?

Sucks to be an idiot I would bet, doesn't it, itchynny? But I've gotten over it.

Male Privilege. by Seacrest_Hulkin MensRights

[–]PierceHarlan 86 points87 points ago

We need to end the selective service. The gender double standard is not consonant with our overriding gender neutral laws. It's a peculiar remnant of a chivalry that should not be institutionalized in law.

There's no draft, and little chance of a draft now, so why must all men, and only men, between the ages of 18 and 25 and living in the United States, register for a potential military draft under the nation's Selective Service System?

No hardship making young men register, you say? The hardship is if you don't register. My guess is that a lot of disadvantaged guys don't, for any number of reasons. What happens if a man fails to register? "A man who fails to register may, if prosecuted and convicted, face a fine of up to $250,000 and/or a prison term of up to five years. Even if not tried, a man who fails to register with Selective Service before turning age 26 may find that some doors are permanently closed."

Among the doors permanently closed to men who fail to register are the following:

STUDENT FINANCIAL AID: Men, born after December 31, 1959, who aren't registered with Selective Service won't qualify for Federal student loans or grant programs. This includes Pell Grants, College Work Study, Guaranteed Student/Plus Loans, and National Direct Student Loans.

CITIZENSHIP: The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) makes registration with Selective Service a condition for U.S. citizenship if the man first arrived in the U.S. before his 26th birthday.

FEDERAL JOB TRAINING: The Workforce Investment Act (formerly called the Job Training Partnership Act - JTPA) offers programs that can train young men for jobs in auto mechanics and other skills. This program is only open to those men who register with Selective Service. Only men born after December 31, 1959, are required to show proof of registration.

FEDERAL JOBS: A man must be registered to be eligible for jobs in the Executive Branch of the Federal government and the U.S. Postal Service. Proof of registration is required only for men born after December 31, 1959.

The states have their own penalties for men who fail to register.

Women are exempt from registering, yet, the Selective Service's Web site is replete with assertions of its own fairness. The following sentences are teeming with irony: "If a draft is ever needed, it must be as fair as possible, and that fairness depends on having as many eligible men as possible registered." And: "Only if there is high compliance with this law, will a future draft be fair and equitable."

It seems palpably hollow to assert that a future draft will "be fair and equitable" if it excludes from the outset more than one-half of the pool of eligible registrants merely because of their birth class; namely, all females aged 18-26.

And, no, I don't want women to be forced to register. No one should have to register.

But every year, even without a draft, the present law is penalizing a massive number of men, and only men, by making them possible felons and permanently stripping them of valuable rights and privileges that their same-age female peers, and the men who know to register, have. The numbers of men affected are staggering. According to the Annual Report to Congress of the Selective Service System for fiscal year 2009: "[I]f a man fails to register, or fails to provide evidence that he is exempt from the registration requirement . . ., his name is referred to the Department of Justice . . . for possible investigation and prosecution for his failure to register, as required by the Military Selective Service Act. During FY 2009, 169,586 names and addresses of suspected violators were provided to the DoJ, an increase of 22% from FY 2008." And every name on that list is male.

Let that number sink in: 169,586. It is reasonable to assume that the vast majority of these men are lacking in education and social standing, and most likely just don't fully understand -- despite the Selective Service System's explicit warnings -- what failing to register could mean to them. The penalties to be imposed on these men for this infraction will only add to their oppression.

Female Navy junior officer accuses enlisted man of sexual assault to cover up her own fraternization; his 16 year military career is over and he cannot find civilian employment due to his conviction, while her career continues unscathed by WellByein MensRights

[–]PierceHarlan 0 points1 point ago

Gonzales' punishment is not necessarily unjust, but the the double-standard that punishes one party but not another for fraternization, is. Worse, a sexual assault accusation is used as both a shield to protect the accuser from punishment, and a sword to perpetrate an unjust double-standard.

http://www.cotwa.info/2012/05/unfounded-sexual-assault-claim-leaves.html

Intense feminist emotional call out to women against men. I wanted to find just one quote. but there are just too many. by rensinin MensRights

[–]PierceHarlan 1 point2 points ago

I agree that assigning gender roles is both limiting and unjust, but the hysteria and paranoia in this piece does nothing to advance the cause of gender equity.

A feminist writes "perhaps it’s premature to start worrying too much about the “second sexism” (Misandry) when the first one (Misoygny) seems so prevalent still." by rugbysoccer34in MensRights

[–]PierceHarlan 0 points1 point ago

While I have grown weary of articles and books positing that "men have it worse," in this case, the reviewer's arguments are terribly weak and not at all persuasive. If this were all we had to go by, I'd say men definitely do it worse.

Peru wants psych tests on men to curb domestic violence. Mayors will ask every groom to take a psychological exam as a prerequisite to getting married, so the bride knows before heading down the aisle if their hubby is a psycho. Feminists in Peru say this is a step forward. by TerriChrisin MensRights

[–]PierceHarlan 0 points1 point ago

My concerns:

(1) I don't like it for the same reason I don't like profiling at the airport (I wish I had a dollar for every conservative radio talkmeister I've heard moaning that airport screeners should only pat down or body scan Muslim men and leave granny alone.)

(2) I have no faith that their conclusions would be accurate.

This week's reports from COTWA by PierceHarlanin MensRights

[–]PierceHarlan[S] 0 points1 point ago

It was something we decided to do last Autumn, but it had been an idea brewing for a long time. We noticed we had support from rape victims, but our name suggested to some objective people that we were denying the horrors of rape. We've always tried to be allied with rape survivors, but then I encountered in my law practice one of the nation's most prominent victims of clergy sex abuse, and I saw the horrors up close. I am intent on making sure that no rape survivor ever thinks there is any division between them and COTWA.

This week's reports from COTWA by PierceHarlanin MensRights

[–]PierceHarlan[S] 0 points1 point ago

Just needed to catch-up.

This week's reports from COTWA by PierceHarlanin MensRights

[–]PierceHarlan[S] 1 point2 points ago

Successor to False Rape Society. Take a look, you might like it.

Saw this today and I suppose that's where we're headed... by SuicideBananain MensRights

[–]PierceHarlan 0 points1 point ago

I agree that the radical progressives have a monopoly on hysteria. That's why I react as I do when I see even a hint of it slip into our side.

We are going to be the adults in the room on this issue, if I have anything to say about it.

Saw this today and I suppose that's where we're headed... by SuicideBananain MensRights

[–]PierceHarlan 2 points3 points ago

Alanna, perhaps I'm asking too much of people who haven't been involved in this issue for long, but I am trying, very hard, to have us be the adults in the room, and to able to paint the extremists on the other side as the ones who don't belong at the adult table. We have some really serious issues to discuss, issues that aren't advanced with that level of discourse. But I do see the point about this being a conversation starter for some.

Saw this today and I suppose that's where we're headed... by SuicideBananain MensRights

[–]PierceHarlan 4 points5 points ago*

"In other words, most of us are not calling women potential liars because we think women are inherently dishonest."

As someone who devotes a lot of time to these issues, I do appreciate the distinction, and I appreciate how well you've articulated it. I've upvoted you for it.

My point, though, tries goes beyond that. At COTWA, and I hope elsewhere, we have reached the stage where there's no more time for hyperbole, or making bold statements that serve only to get the troops fired up. We need to be taken seriously on these issues on a wide scale, not just preach to the choir. We cannot be taken seriously when by venting or being "in your face," or by describing the problem in a way that doesn't ring true.

I''m not "offended" by this shirt by any means. It's just that I don't think it advances the interests of the wrongly accused.

Saw this today and I suppose that's where we're headed... by SuicideBananain MensRights

[–]PierceHarlan 9 points10 points ago*

I am founder of http://www.cotwa.info/ and I respectfully write to suggest that members of the community of the wrongly accused don't benefit from this kind of hysteria or grotesque exaggeration. We trivialize their plight, and we build insurmountable gender barriers, when we insist, or even jokingly suggest, that men need to regard every woman as a potential false rape accuser. Imagine a shirt that said "BACK UP. If you can read this, and we're alone, I can be raped." We would be outraged, and rightfully so.

The vast majority of women and men are offended by false rape claims; the persons most offended, aside from the victims of such offenses, seem to be rape victims themselves, because they understand that every rape lie diminishes the integrity of every rape victim.

The delicate balance that commands us to punish rapists while not punishing the innocent is extremely serious business. We need more sober, more adult, more serious voices to be part of the public discourse. The last thing we need is more Chicken Little hysteria, no matter which side it's coming from.

view more: next