Boiling an entire argument down to being a "cute slogan" is flippant and I will call it that if it's appropriate (which it is). I assume you don't understand how painful it is for you to talk to people like that, because you continue to do it.

I'm very sorry about the women in your life who have been raped. I want very badly to state that they are not who I am talking about. I'm talking about you and your argument, which is not justified by what happened to the people you know. You are being dismissive to people who it is statistically safe to assume have gone through similar experiences as the very people you care about and use as proof of your expertise on feeling about rape.

The logical end of putting the onus on women to prevent rape is that it in turn puts the onus onto the victims who obviously weren't good at preventing their own rape. The truth is that it is impossible for women to prevent rape on their own. If that were true, women in cultures where the punishment for rape is execution would probably work their asses off preventing themselves from getting raped.

If men are unable to understand consent, then they hold within them the potential to accidentally hurt somebody they didn't intend to (you refer to this as "the worst type of criminals" by which I assume you mean violent rapists, which is not the focus of this education). Violent stranger-rape probably won't be helped much even by counseling, unless the counseling has more to do with violence.

But teaching men how to gauge consent and in what situations it can get murky and at what point it gets harmful to continue sexual contact can help keep men who aren't sure from learning after the fact. It's difficult to tell which men have learned what and where. Just like every pack of tampons has the insert with the diagrams of how to insert a tampon even though the majority of people buying tampons already know how. It's a safety precaution, not an accusation that we're doing it wrong.