this post was submitted on
25 points (76% like it)
36 up votes 11 down votes

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own!

all 126 comments

[–]foreverinane 39 points40 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

No, but you are obligated to move over, unless you can't (like on express lane)

I've also noticed that sections on 101 where speed limit is 55mph still go 75mph when traffic is light without issue from cops

[–]cerephic 14 points15 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

yes. you are expected to move over to the right. General etiquette here is to move over when you see a car coming up on you that might be faster than you're driving. Let them pass on the left!

If they're tailing you uncomfortably, that's because it's rude of them to pass on the right, as well as illegal.

[–]rabidcow 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

it's rude of them to pass on the right, as well as illegal.

It's actually not illegal to pass on the right under most circumstances where a sane person would attempt it. http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc21754.htm

[–]vampire_kitty 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is not simply etiquette, it's actually the law.

Not that any of the cops actually ticket for it, though. sigh and a facepalm

[–]cerephic 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I've seen them flip on the lights to get someone to move out of the HOV lane when they're impeding traffic.

[–]Damey 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

HOV is not something you look at and think 'Oh, carpool'.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

(my circumstances aside) Even in a car pool lane?

[–]studiov34 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

People in the car pool lane are usually there because they want a faster way to get somewhere, dontchya think? It's a perk to people carpooling, not some silly arbitrary vehicle sorting method.

[–]dakta 9 points10 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yup, no exceptions. It's in the United States Uniform Vehicle Code:

Upon all roadways any vehicle proceeding at less than the normal speed of traffic at the time and place and under the conditions then existing shall be driven in the right-hand lane then available for traffic ...

Notice how they say "the normal speed of traffic", not "the speed limit". This is a safety and efficiency issue: even if the rest of the traffic is going faster than you, you still have to let them pass. **Edit (clarity): If you are unable or unwilling to allow them to pass, then you should increase your speed to match theirs. It's the law.\*

* Subject to interpretation.

[–]BarfingBear 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Uh, no. That's a tacit agreement between drivers, but increasing your speed because someone is tailgating you is not only illegal but stupid.

[–]dakta 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

See the recently added *.

[–]Terrible_Wingman 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Increasing speed when someone is tailgating you is not illegal.

[–]rabble123 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You're going 65. If you increase your speed to 75 because some douche is riding your ass, you can get pulled over.

[–]Terrible_Wingman 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

All lanes except for the right most lane are for passing. If you are not passing move to the right, end of story. Benefit comes from those who yield. Not the retard who calls the left lane "the fast lane."

Ps. What if it is a non-douche riding your ass?

[–]BarfingBear 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

True, but If you increase your speed beyond the speed limit, it is illegal. That's why it is called the limit.

[–]BarfingBear 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Why would a non-douche ride your ass?

[–]alcapwned 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The lanes of 880 get very narrow and bendy in Oakland. They drop the speed limit to 55 in this area but everyone ignores it. A year or two ago they dropped a small stretch down to 45, but people still completely ignore it. The fast lane still goes ~75 and the rest goes ~65. I've never seen anyone pulled over there.

[–]clunkclunk 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Ugh, I hate that part where they lowered it even further. The few cars that obey the 45mph are like stationary targets for the rest of the cars doing 65mph.

Accidents happen when cars are going different speeds on the same stretches of road. If they made that area 65mph, there would be fewer issues, IMHO.

[–]dakta 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And these vehicles are technically in violation of the US Uniform Vehicle Code (besides state specific vehicle codes):

Upon all roadways any vehicle proceeding at less than the normal speed of traffic at the time and place and under the conditions then existing shall be driven in the right-hand lane then available for traffic ...

[–]precarious_quiesence 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

if you're driving in rush hour you're lucky if you can get up to 45mph... which is why when the road is clear you can bet your ass most drivers will take full advantage and go 75

as long as you go "with the flow" of traffic it's generally ok - cars going much slower than the general flow of traffic are a far greater risk to others

i was S/B on 880 in Oakland one morning when ALL lanes were going 85+ - the CHP did a traffic break to get us to slow down to about 70 but didn't pull anyone over - i was happy for the "warning" since CHP lined the road all the way down to Santa Barbara that day, and the others weren't being so lenient

[–]ablindone 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well, the reason they don't ticket might not be that 65 or 75 is safe but that it would technically be a "speed trap" and anybody given a ticket who fought it would win their case and ticket would be dropped, wasting the CHP's time.

[–]fc3s 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's easy to fly in the fast lane because people are afraid to get close to the concrete retaining walls. Less people drive in that lane so you can blow by traffic at +15mph if you are comfortable in closer quarters.

[–]cokacokacoh[!] 23 points24 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I don't know if there is such a thing as Bay Area driving etiquette. I've seen every kind of non-sensical driving on the roads (880, 80, 101).

My pet peeve: All lanes going the same speed. There's no traffic, just drivers side-by-side-by-side, all going about 70-75. I thought the whole point of lanes was to allow a varied set of driving speeds, with slower traffic staying right.

[–]zakool21 -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is worst on Hwy 13, the Warren Freeway. It has a lot of uphill and downhill sections but is very very straight. For some reason in a 65mph zone people feel inclined to use the left lane to go 45-55mph uphill when 75 is perfectly acceptable. Makes me rage so hard because it happens EVERY DAY in both directions.

[–]studioidefix 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I see that a lot on Central Expressway, clunkers/vans/trucks driving at 40 side by side when the road ahead of them is empty and letting no one pass

[–]maredc 33 points34 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

From my own experience, I think 80 mph is the standard for the fast lane on most of the freeways... does that sound about right to people?

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

My rule of thumb has been to drive the faster of the speed or 75 on Bay Area freeways. I've heard cops don't pull over cars driving 10 or less over the speed limit. So far it's held up, as I've driven past plenty of cops driving 75 without getting a ticket

[–]Kspit 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I've heard from a lot of CHP that 16 over and they are supposed to pull you over, obviously it is at their discretion and depending on if you are driving like a maniac weaving in and out of traffic a la castro valley...

[–]zakool21 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Funny you should mention castro valley... One of two tickets I've ever gotten was on the way to work only about 3 miles out of cv on 580. I was doing 84 in a 65 in the left lane in my old red BMW while on the phone. Just was oblivious to the speed. Rolled down the window and the CHP offier just shook his head and said somberly 'way too fast, way too fast.' He wrote the ticket for 80 and I got off with traffic school and a $200 ticket.

[–]DominathanSB - Milpitas 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

On 580 at 3am, I got pulled over going 80..... 80. "Do you know how fast you were going, Sir?" "80." "Yep, right on the money."

ಠ_ಠ

[–]zakool21 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Money machine.

[–]reiduhEB - Union City 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Got to keep those flashing lights...

[–]charliehustlee 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You realize this is an admission of guilt and that it can/will be used in court if it goes that far.

[–]DominathanSB - Milpitas 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah, I realized that after. I'll be quiet from now on.

[–]charliehustlee 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Sall good. I learned the hard way as well. I always thought being honest would help but in reality, you need to be ambiguous.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's because of the CHP station in CV. They never seem to want to venture too far from there.

[–]zakool21 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Bastards.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

CHP is the only department I've seemed to have trouble with. They're usually rude and aggressive when there's no need. Alameda county sheriffs, Hayward PD, Oakland PD, and SF PD have all been nice and excellent when I've dealt with them. I do have the most experience with Hayward though, and have come to personally know most of the officers.

There's just something about CHP though. Even the city cops I know don't like them.

[–]Damey 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's because people puke on their boots.... true story.

[–]originalwanster 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I got pulled over a couple weeks ago for driving 81 on the 101 near the San Mateo Bridge and was driving on the fast lane as well. My excuse was that I'm normally an LA driver (still adjusting to the Bay Area!), so I don't think 80 works.

[–]VeggiePetsitter 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You can tell you're an LA driver because you call it "the 101" instead of just plain old "101"

[–]originalwanster 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Not adding a "the" in front of freeway numbers is just plain weird IMO, but then again I was born and raised in LA.

[–]stave 21 points22 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If all other lanes are practically empty, wtf are you doing in the express lane?

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The express lanes are split into sections about 5 miles long where you can't (legally) merge on or off. Hard to predict if there will be traffic a few miles down the road, especially on a holiday.

[–]Wrxed 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Unless you're entirely sure you are and will always be the fastest car on the road fast-lane camping is not acceptable etiquette.

[–]___forMVP 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If it's practically empty then just pull to the right, I can't see an officer giving you a ticket for that.

[–]fawnmm 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I grew up, learned how to drive and drove in So Cal for 13 years. I've been a Bay Area resident/driver for 4 years.

While there are drivers in every state that are complete morons (I travel for work) I am sometimes blown away at the large number of the drivers in the Bay Area that can't seem to drive over 50mph on the freeways. WTH??!!! Am I the only one that comes across this every time I get on a freeway? Of course there are always the speeders but I take issue with the pokie joes too. And I seem to have a huge problem with drivers who have issues with merging onto the freeways up here. I think it's because the majority of the ramps in the Bay are short. I have no problem because my dad taught me to "shit or get" when it comes to merging, meaning to press on the gas and get up to speed best you can BEFORE you merge on the freeway.

[–]surrealize 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This!!!! What is the deal with freeway merges, bay area? The whole point of the ramp is so that you merge onto the freeway at freeway speeds. It's dangerous to merge into a lane if you're going 20mph slower than everyone else in the lane.

[–]sam0 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I think the worse in the Bay Area is where a freeway merge is just before a freeway exit. People slowing down to exit (although you normally should only slow down once you're on the ramp, which you can't in the Bay Area given how freaking short they are) are crossing people accelerating to enter the freeway. A good example of this is in Mountain View on the 101 South, Rengstorff exit.

[–]lappet 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

its worse near the Mountain View exit on 85

[–]javy925 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

this right here is my biggest fucking pet peeve about driving in the bay area. I have a 30+ mile commute and I come across so much needless traffic caused by people going 50mph bunching up together. These are the same people who can't merge, either.

[–]charliehustlee 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Since no one has said this yet, ill be the asshole. All the issues with driving in the bay area have to deal with the larger than normal Asian population, (not just eastern Asia - Chinese, Japanese but also central, Indian, Pakistani etc) If this makes me a racist than so be it. If you are born here/grew up here(this extends to people of Asian decent as well) then you know how to drive properly. If you moved here on a visa/green card then you drive 50 mph in the left hand lane when there is no traffic and just box people in. Also when merging you show no confidence and end up driving on the shoulder for 1000 feet till there is a 500 ft gap so you can join the rest of us on the legal roadway.

I commute 50 miles a day from Hayward to Sunnyvale. I also used to hyper commute from Campbell to Tiburon so I have SEEN some shit my friends.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If you're passing/driving fast than traffic to your right, knock yourself out.

If not, then you should be over at least one lane except if it's the HOV lane during HOV hours. Then you should move over and let people pass only if safe; if not, fuck them.

[–]ShakeyBobWillis 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"Slower traffic keep right." Everything else is always viewed from within this framework.

[–]detaer 12 points13 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Stop driving slow in the fast lane, or get out of the fast lane.

[–]motorpoodle 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

They were talking about the carpool lane.

[–]detaer 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah that is even worse. Some jackoff at 10pm with 2 people in the car doing 60 miles an hour because its they are a carpool. The carpool lane passenger restrictions end at 9am and 7pm after that its the fast lane..

[–]motorpoodle 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Trying to figure out what makes you think they weren't driving during carpool hours.

[–]dakta -3 points-2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

detaer said (and I paraphrase) "There was an impolite motorist in the carpool lane one evening around 10 PM, driving at 60 miles per hour, presumably because they thought themselves a carpool designated vehicle. Little did they know, carpool lane restrictions go from an unknown time in the morning hours until 9 AM, and then from an unknown time in the afternoon hours until 7 PM. At all other times, said lane is considered a normal lane."

This makes it abundantly clear that the other motorist was not driving during carpool hours.

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]dakta 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

My mistake. It appears that you are correct. I missed the context a little.

(Edited for accuracy. The original comment looked like I saw trying to cover my ass. That was not my intent.)

[–]Munz0 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Passing lane != fast lane

[–]detaer 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Sorry dude, in california its the fastlane.

[–]superrandomguy 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I started a thread about this exact same issue a while ago:

http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/h4woc/why_do_people_insist_on_tailgating_the_person_in/

The problem is, everyone chiming in from areas with no carpool lane (and no firm grasp of what its function actually is) will respond with "move out of the way if someone wants to drive faster than you"

Even if it's not the "express lane", in my opinion, the standard carpool lane should not be treated as a "fast lane" unless it is being used during the hours when the "2 or more persons per vehicle" isn't in effect.

Why should anyone have to pull to the right into much slower traffic (we're talking 65+ mph vs below 50) when the reason they are in that lane is because they have 2 people in their car...not because they wan't to drive above the speed limit.

You're not obligated to move in your scenario...however if it's between 9am and 3pm, then it's a fast lane and normal rules apply.

[–]frownyface 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And don't just think of it as the "Fast lane", it's the -passing- lane. You really only should be in it if you are actively passing (unless, like you point out, it's a carpool lane)

[–]TheVector 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Why should anyone have to pull to the right into much slower traffic (we're talking 65+ mph vs below 50) when the reason they are in that lane is because they have 2 people in their car...not because they wan't to drive above the speed limit.

Why should anyone have to slow down to 65 mph when they were going 80 because someone doesn't want to use the left most lane to the full advantage.

Ok that's a bit of a stretch, I personally am usually happy as long as the car in the fast lane is going faster then a lane over.

Hopefully you see that this is almost the same situation that you don't think is fair is happening to someone else with slow drivers in the fast lane. "I don't want to have to slow down, but it is ok for me to slow down other people".

And don't say 65 is the speed limit so it is ok, there are roads where you will get run off the slow lane for going 65.

[–]superrandomguy 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It is not a passing lane during hours of enforcement, it is a special lane designated for cars with multiple occupants (and enforced with hefty fines for single occupant cars trying to use this lane).

The only reason the carpool lane moves faster than all other lanes during peak traffic hours is because you are required to have more than one person in the car during hours when that law is enforced. Therefore, in most scenarios there are less cars in this lane and it moves faster by default...not because it's on the far left/is a passing lane.

During normal circumstances, I'm not the type of person to enforce the speed limit when i see fit by obstructing faster cars out of spite (this is dangerous for a number of reasons), but OP and myself are not referring to normal circumstances.

As a matter of fact, it's a ridiculous idea to ride someone's ass or travel in great excess of the speed limit in a lane that's moving at least 20mph faster than the rest of traffic. It's a rear end accident waiting to happen when someone needs to merge in or out of the slower traffic.

[–]TheVector 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah I think you are missing the point. I'm not saying it is ok to tailgate people who drive 65 in the carpool lane, I'm just saying that you should be considerate to those who want to go faster than you and there is no arbitrary point which makes the speed your traveling acceptable.

[–]za1nsta 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

DAE notice how san jose seems to have tons of the on/off ramps that are one thing altogether. So that people getting on the freeway have to fight through the people getting off the freeway into the same lane. These frustrate me because they OBVIOUSLY create traffic jams during peak hours. ie. 101 and capitol expressway.

[–]charliehustlee 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

try 101 south in mtn view. The exit with the in n out before 85 is litterally 100 feet long for traffic merging on and off. Its a nightmare.

[–]theblackoutdetective 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I think most drivers will assume you will move over or go faster, the drivers behind you wont move, they will just ride until you submit :/ I have seen more and more drivers going over 75 MPH regularly, it is crazy!

[–]samolito 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Not sure if I'm reading this right, but are you saying you expect drivers going faster than you to go around you? I hope not....moving over for faster cars is the standard courtesy.

[–]theblackoutdetective 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

it was written pretty confusingly, sorry. I was saying that no matter how fast you are going, someone will come up from behind and expect you to move over, as opposed to laying back and going 75, 80 or 85mph or more with you.

[–]renner2 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

no, you have zero obligation to drive faster than safe. The benefit of the carpool lane there is its limited access, not that people can drive 85+ on it.

[–]splashback 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This would be a faux pas, etiquette-wise. "Slower traffic keep right", etc. If someone is riding your trail, and you have clear freeway in front of you... get out of the left lane.

[–]renner2 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

So you want someone to break the law either by speeding or deliberately changing lanes out of a controlled access area? etiquette requires me to break the law?

[–]klinquist 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

No, you should exit the express lane when you can legally do so.

[–]splashback 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

etiquette requires me to break the law?

No. It's not illegal to use a lane to the right of the left-most lane.

[–]akdas 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Just as a heads up, OP is talking about an express lane with explicit entrances and exits, where you can pay to use without having a passenger, where you generally don't exit until the specific exit point.

[–]captaintrips420 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

In that express lane, let the guy behind you break the law and go around, or he will go around at the next exit/entrance juncture.

[–]VeggiePetsitter 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Tailgating is a larger and more dangerous faux pas

[–]splashback 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I agree, but my point remains.

[–]rabidcow 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Notwithstanding the prima facie speed limits, any vehicle proceeding upon a highway at a speed less than the normal speed of traffic moving in the same direction at such time shall be driven in the right-hand lane for traffic or as close as practicable to the right-hand edge or curb

http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc21654.htm

[–]hollywoodhoogle 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

No. Just because the car pool lane is on the left does not make it the fastest lane. It is the chill out at 70, 75 I'm on my way to work. Also known as I got my Prius a yellow sticker lane.

People forget that the car pool is an outside lane to the normal system. There are slow and fast lanes then there is also, wait for it .... A car pool lane.

[–]Younggrad 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Agreed. I dont understand the hostility.

[–]sticky_wicket 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

No. Just because the car pool lane is on the left does not make it the fastest lane.

That is actually the definition of why it is the fast lane. See CA Vehicle code 21654(a)

Notwithstanding the prima facie speed limits, any vehicle proceeding upon a highway at a speed less than the normal speed of traffic moving in the same direction at such time shall be driven in the right-hand lane for traffic or as close as practicable to the right-hand edge or curb, except when overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction or when preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into a private road or driveway.

Dont block the fast lane!!!!

[–]hollywoodhoogle 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I get upset at people parking in the fast lane but the pool lane is not the fast lane, in my opinion. You have the the three lanes going from slow to fast then then the extra lane that is meant to relieve traffic for those o us that carpool. I agree with you but only for non carpool left lanes

[–]sticky_wicket 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm kind of at a loss for why people think their opinion gets written into the law just because it is their own. Its a really consistent thing I have come across no matter how explicit the black letter is, and I mean this one says absolutely nothing about carpool lanes, people will always write in an exception for the conduct they want to do and proclaim it "obvious." We are talking everything all the way up to murder- "I needed my money back, he wouldn't give it, so I had to kill him to get it. That cant be illegal- he was in the wrong." I literally heard that from someone.

You don't have to merge out of 75mph into 25mph every time someone comes up behind you in the HOV lane, just be aware its against the law to block traffic wherever you are so avoid it when you can.

[–]renner2 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The OPs carpool lane, by definition, is a separate controlled access roadway -- I doubt that applies. In many cities these are further separated by soft hit poles or concrete barriers to prove that point.

I could see this applying on the 101 lanes, for instance.

[–]sticky_wicket 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Its pretty clear black letter law- you don't get to read in your own suppositions just because you feel like it. The vehicle code is there online for you to look at.

From an efficiency standpoint it makes sense the way the law is written- if you are obstructing the carpool lane you should move over even if you are a carpool. I think its pretty ballsy to be like "No, Im going to be in the way and that's just how its going to be. You should plan extra time for me to do my thing in MY lane." Maybe narcissistic is a better word.

[–]FWIW 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Obstructing the lane by going 10 over the speed limit? You're seriously saying that the law backs up people going faster than that, rather than those already going 10 over (or going the speed limit)?

[–]hollywoodhoogle 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yes

[–]FWIW 0 points1 point ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Oh, okay. Well then I guess the cop that pulls me over for going more than 10 over is just going to say, "That's okay! You followed the law because you were in the left (carpool) lane!!"

[–]sticky_wicket -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

No, you just get out of the way for other people who want to go faster. There is nothing saying you have to speed, there is a law that you must yield so you don't impede others.

[–]sticky_wicket -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yes, its a passing lane irrespective of the speeds involved.

[–]FWIW 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The carpool lane is not a passing lane. It's a driving lane for people who carpool.

[–]sticky_wicket -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Re-read the part of the vehicle code I posted above out loud and very slowly. 21654(a) doesn't say anything about different kinds of lanes, it is a rule that applies to the road generally.

Everybody thinks their level of speeding is cool but going faster is insane. Its narcissistic to think you are a better judge and above a law which explicitly says that you are not. Get out of the way.

[–]dunskwerk 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

here a very basic principle when interpreting laws:

a specific law governs a general law

apply this principle to general passing rules and specific carpool lane rules

[–]FWIW 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Bam. Lawyered.

[–]sticky_wicket 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yes it is still a passing lane. You should not occupy it if you are not passing cars even if you are a carpool. Why would you anyway if the other lanes were clear? it doesn't get you ahead and it does block others.

[–]R3Dscar13 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

if someone is on ur ass, move to the lane on ur right then move back after the person has past.... It's not that difficult.

[–]adrianmonk 11 points12 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

it was the 680 express lane (where you can't exit or enter).

[–]R3Dscar13 -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

then fu*k the guy creeping up on you if ur going at least 10 over the speed limit he's just being a dick

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

75 is about my limit for any fast lane. I've noticed in the Bay Area cops don't seem to car, but I've gotten pulled over elsewhere for it.

If someone is riding me I tend to slow down to the speed limit. It's just rude to be on someone's ass like that.

I haven't done much driving outside the Bay, but I've noticed on my few excursions to Sacramento and San Diego that people do not know how to drive in traffic there. It seems like no one knows how to merge properly and everyone just doesn't give a shit. At least around here the majority of people know how to merge and drive with some manners.

[–]treitter 12 points13 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

75 is about my limit for any fast lane. I've noticed in the Bay Area cops don't seem to car, but I've gotten pulled over elsewhere for it.

If you're going 75 in the fast lane, and anyone gets close behind you, please move over. If you don't want to speed, let them be the one who speeds and takes the risk. It's better than forcing them to pass you on the right (which can contribute to congestion, screw up regular driving patterns, etc.).

If someone is riding me I tend to slow down to the speed limit. It's just rude to be on someone's ass like that.

This is how accidents and road rage happen. Don't be a passive-aggressive driver. Be better than them.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I should clarify: If I'm in a lane I can move out of, I'll move, but if I'm stuck there due to traffic or a special lane, like OP stated, then I'm not going to continue to increase my speed just because the douchebag behind me decided he wants to do 90.

[–]treitter 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Agreed, that's different.

[–]red0x 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

People like this are assholes. Anything over 65 mph is a 'bonus', not a right. In fact, it's illegal, and they shouldn't be pressing you to break the law.

Especially given that you're in a lane you can't legally merge out of to get out of the way. I just let these people break the law to pass me.

Anecdote time: I heard a story of a guy getting pulled over for being in this lane without the minimum 2 people. So, cop pulls up behind with lights and sirens, and he crossed the double lines to pull over. Cop gave the driver TWO tickets: one for breaking the carpool law, and another for crossing the double lines.

Let the asshole continue being an asshole.

Also, merge better, bay area.

[–]stevep98 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Should've fought that last bit in court I think... I might have done the same thing. If you see an emergency vehicle in your mirror you're supposed to pull to the right, and I would think this would supersede painted yellow lines on the road. But it was also probably a dick move on the part of the officer... He should have waited until the express lane exit to flash his lights

[–]m0llusk 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Around 75 seems to be when I get tickets. There isn't much to be done about tailgating except to make sure you avoid doing it also by maintaining appropriate distance in front.

[–]jintana 0 points1 point ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is a general Bay-Area traffic rant, not a specific-to-OP situation.

People in the left lane going slower than the car behind you:

You do not know why the person wants to pass. Perhaps they budgeted their time perfectly but ran into a train on a side road and are now late. Perhaps there's someone about to literally pop out a baby in the car. Perhaps it's a random person who's been just trying to get somewhere but has been impeded every single time by people who box them in and refuse to let them pass and you're the twenty-seventh person to do that this trip. Perhaps there's a financial incentive. What the fuck ever the reason, unless you are the police, it is not your job to decide what speed is too fast for someone else. It is your job to decide what speed is proper for the vehicle you are driving. It is just as illegal to impede passing traffic in the left lane in California and 28 other states as it is to drive over the speed limit, so that argument is bogus.

MOVE OVER.

Also, people need to judge how fast an oncoming vehicle is traveling before cutting out in front of it, whether making a turn or switching lanes. If it's going faster than yours, wait a damn moment. It's dangerous and discourteous to assume someone driving faster than you prefer to will slow or stop for you just because you feel like wandering out into the road. (Don't do that on foot or bicycle, either!)

[–]WitheredTree -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Tailgaters suck!

[–]lolstebbo 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You should be obligated to not get in the lane to begin with. The idea of the express lane is it's faster, and if you're impeding the flow of traffic, then don't get in the damn lane to begin with.

After four years of college in SoCal, I thought I was finally free of the stupid "stuck in the carpool lane" nonsense (it's extra-infuriating when the carpool/express lane is moving slower than then regular lanes when drivers enter the carpool/express lane "because they can" and then defeat the purpose of the lane).

[–]EkriirkE -2 points-1 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

So you are one of those assholes that goes all the way left because they can (eg 2+ people and HOV), and then proceeds to go the speed limit? Stay to the very far right lane, please.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I was driving 75 in a lane I couldn't get out of. Of course, normally I'd move over.

[–]EkriirkE 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The persons I speak of are the ones who feel obligated, in an uncongested road, to go to the HOV just because they are 2+ and go 65 or less.

[–]hollywoodhoogle 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

As my GF pointed out it's often unsafe to exit the carpool lane. If you are going faster than the cars beside you to the right. Exiting and entering the cp lane I'd dodgy. I vote for more of the soft barriers things

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]klinquist 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I think it's rather obvious when to adhere to his advice.

[–]Flooberjibby 0 points1 point ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I had the same sort of thought as motorpoodle - as in, if the freeway (read all lanes to my *right) is going 70, I'm going 75, and someone comes up behind me at 80 or 85, meaning that I have to slow down in the next lane to the right to get out of his way, should I do it? Is it rude not to, even though I AM still passing people and would require that I hit the brakes once I change lanes?

*edit - I meant lanes to my RIGHT, not my left.

[–]klinquist 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I would personally let of the gas first with my turn signal on to show intention, then move over when I can and not requiring the brakes.

[–]sticky_wicket 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah if they are on your ass you can pick a spot with a few car lengths, they should be by you really quickly.

[–]EkriirkE 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

In this scenario - IF I am the "leader", I maintain my current speed until I can move over without cutting anyone off. If I'm not the leader and pacing the person in front of me, then fuck 'em let them have fun swerving around on my ass while I play with my ebrake.

[–]hollywoodhoogle 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Then 80mph is stupid. Some pulls out to join your lane ... Dead

[–]FrugalNinja -2 points-1 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Speed limit is 65, guess how fast you are supposed to be going, stay in your lane and fuck that asshole behind you, he needs to learn how to drive.

[–]theblackoutdetective -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I love to put on the windshield wipers and fluid if someone is riding my bumper. Especially if we are going over 75 mph with room on either lane. It is also a great tool for d-bags who don't signal.