this post was submitted on
38 points (75% like it)
57 up votes 19 down votes

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own!

all 166 comments

[–]dcruzer 9 points10 points ago*

Adding some of my (short) experience that might help others looking into doing this:

I bought my first bike back in August for $1000 - a '93 Nighthawk 250. It's not old enough to be tagged as historic (which is cheaper), but titling and registering (for two years) was $100. (Note: I'm in VA, and titling tax was 3% or a minimum of $35). I have property tax on it, but I haven't the slightest clue how much it is yet (they'll be using the blue book).

Gas mileage: Anyway, since it has a small engine, I get about ~75 mpg. On a 3 gallon tank with under $15, I can go from my college to home (210 mi) on one tank and still have enough gas to do errands. With the amount of driving I was doing compared to the little Honda Civic I was previously using, I saved on gas pretty much the first month. I went from paying $100+ on gas a month to <$30.

Insurance: I had the option of not paying for insurance and paying the state $500/yr for not having insurance or getting insurance. I'm sure as hell getting insurance on it. I got liability from Geico for $167/year. My insurance was low because I'm a female rider, I'm a returning customer, I'm military, and although I told them I mainly ride my motorcycle within the DC area, I'm from a rural area, so they had to keep it low for that area. My insurance COULD be much lower. I told them I did NOT have my license at the time, and I had a permit. I also do not yet have my MSF card (motorcycle safety foundation). Other ways to bring your insurance down: Garage your bike. I told them I've only been riding for less than a year (truth) but if, say, you ride dirt bikes, some people add that in for how long they've been riding.

Gear: I borrowed gear (helmet and when it got cold, jacket and overpants) for a few months. Granted, it's not a great idea to borrow something like a helmet. Anyway, I got my helmet for free (a friend had 2 extras lying around, and gave me one, can't help anyone on that one). I went shopping when I was back home from college for gear, and almost gave up before finding a place right across the street from a dealer! It was Black Friday (whoops, didn't even realize, since I don't shop on Black Friday normally), and I got my jacket and overpants for $175 (50% off). When it comes to gear, you should portion probably $500 or less on it. You'll want a good jacket (you could get away with thrifting a leather jacket and layering up). You'll also want overpants (layers are still fine, but a pain in the ass - overpants are easier). Good gloves are gonna cost you about $100 or less. If you're getting a small bike, don't get heated gear, you'll kill the battery...Plus heated gear is a bit more expensive anyway.

Total cost of my first bike, insurance, and winter gear: under $1500

Carrying Groceries and Things: I haven't had a problem thus far. I've used a roomy bookbag and a crabnet on the back of the bike to tie things down. Be creative! My boyfriend's brought things home from a store without a bookbag or a crabnet by using extra plastic bags to tie it down! Or you could just buy saddlebags for your bike.

Edit: If you're thinking of buying your first bike, you shouldn't spend a lot on it. You're gonna make mistakes on it, but if you get a beginner bike, you're more likely to be able to buy it, practice/learn/get used to it, and then sell it for the same price. /r/motorcycles would be a good place to go :)

Also, winter is a great time to get cheap, but good condition bikes, cause people don't like winter/cold. My boyfriend's never bought a bike more than $700 cause he's gotten them in the winter!

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 1 point2 points ago*

Great post. I mentioned it before, but my mileage could be better if my bike was newer and smaller engine. Efficiency has come a long way since '82, but these 250cc are gasoline champs. It's also better to start with a smaller engine. I taught myself on my 850 and that's a lot of power for a newbie, I was lucky not to get banged up besides a couple of tip overs. My bike is a shaft driven 850, around 500 lbs. A 250 will be much lighter and easier to manage.

[–]dcruzer 2 points3 points ago*

Yep. Gas mileage would be the engine and the rider (naturally, and for those who aren't familiar with shifting gears, if you shift at higher RPMs, you're gonna be wasting a bit of gas).

I don't think that's too too much power, since it's not a sports bike. But yea, I also have an '86 Interceptor 500, which only gets abut ~40-60 mpg. Still decent, if you compare it to most cars !

Edit: Oh, yeah! My nighthawk is tiny! It's less than 300 lbs, for all you smaller framed people who may feel intimidated (don't be!)

[–]mecharedneck 0 points1 point ago

I just upvoted for the Interceptor. I had an 86 500 and I absolutely loved it. It looked cool, it felt good, it was really a great machine. When I moved out, my dad gave it away, and as much as I love him, I should kill him for that. I bought it in 1997 for $1200 and I can't find one for under $1500 now.

[–]dcruzer 1 point2 points ago

My boyfriend actually bought mine for $900! But yea, I looked before I got it, and they are hard to find for a decent price...

[–]mecharedneck 0 points1 point ago

Wow, that's a real beauty. I painted mine flat olive drab with an I [heart] nuclear war sticker on it. The original paint looked like something designed for Rocky Balboa.

[–]r3dstormrising 5 points6 points ago

I hope you see this in time

As a motorcyclist for 8 years I wouldn't recommend and older motorcycle like that one. I have had early 80's machines and they required a good bit of maintenance, and parts were hard to locate and get. I would recommend a cheap used ninja 250/500 or Suzuki gs500. They are cheap reliable bike. They can often be bought for under 2k.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 2 points3 points ago*

I understand your concern, but this isn't the case for me. The Suzuki GS series and the Honda series of the same time period where the hot bike during the 80's. Parts are everywhere. This may be true for something hard to find, such as a honda magna or a harley or something like that from the 80's, but not for my bike. I did a major repair after a bad accident, detailed here, for less that $400 with my own labor

Edit: I also haven't had to do any "extra" maintenance. Just the regular scheduled stuff, carb cleaning, spark plug cleaning and adjust, valve clearances, etc.

[–]Rupert17 4 points5 points ago

Can you please explain the details of the state minimum insurance? $100 sounds very low, are you worried you may be under covered?

[–]dcruzer 1 point2 points ago

Not sure about the OP, but for me (I'm in VA), I have to pay $500/year if I don't have insurance on the vehicle. Insurance from Geico was $167/year for liability.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 0 points1 point ago

You can register as an uninsured driver in SC too, but it's also more expensive than any minimum liability coverage as well for a motorcycle.

[–]clanspanker 0 points1 point ago

I am in Texas and it was only $145 for me for a whole year. I have a 1300cc supersport touring bike too. I am 46 years old though with a good driving record so maybe that is why my yearly fee was so low.

[–]ohmygodbees 0 points1 point ago

I'm in Illinois and I pay about the same for a year, I'm 25 and I ride a 94 GS500

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 1 point2 points ago

State minimum varies from state to state, but mine was pretty low considering my bike is a standard (upright posture) and not a sports bike. Even though it has a 4 cylinder engine and is pretty damn quick. It's a shaft driven bike, as opposed to a chain or belt which is much more light and common, but if i really wanted to I could get that front wheel off the ground. State minimum does not cover any damages to my vehicle or my body, only damage I do to others. I think SC is pretty light. Really, it's because I use my bike mainly for commuting to school, and its a 30 year old model, not breaking any speed records this decade.

[–]Bhima 3 points4 points ago

I have an old car, an old motorcycle, and an old bicycle. Most days with passable weather, I ride the bicycle. On occasions when I have a longer distance to cover but the weather is still nice, I hop on the motorcycle. When the weather is poor (like today it's snowing), I have a lot carry, or someone coming with me, I use my car.

The amount of fuel I purchase per year is dramatically less than before I got the bicycle. The extra cost for insurance is minimal but I recall that being different in America. At the end of it all I've saved a lot of money, fluctuating fuel prices don't bother me, I've lost weight, I'm in better shape, and I'm enjoying my life the way I've always wanted to.

Motorcycles might not be for everyone... but anyone serious about being frugal needs to seriously consider avoiding using a car as much as is practical for them and that means some other form of transit: Bicycles, Public transit,... even walking.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 3 points4 points ago

This is really all I was trying to convey. Cars are the least efficient way to travel. Motorcycling can help reduce that waste.

[–]mjar81 12 points13 points ago

I really want a motorcycle for local transportation but I'm afraid the wife doesn't approve. She calls them "donor-cycles" since apparently that's what emergency room doctors call them.

[–]partycentralsupplies 5 points6 points ago

My husband rides. You only live once might as well die enjoying life. On a serious note a bunch of deaths on motorcycles are caused by riding like a moron. Ride safely and you should be okay. Most riders lay it down at some point, but its usually non fatal. Also there are idiots in cars that will kill you but you can attempt to avoid them.

[–]Workslayernumberone 3 points4 points ago

Non fatal isn't the walk in the park you make it out to be. My coworkers husband was clotheslined by a wire hanging across a driveway. He was barely moving but still destroyed his arm. Years of expensive painful surgeries later he has almost full use of his hand. "On a long enough time line, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero"... it just get there faster with a motorcycle.

[–]partycentralsupplies 1 point2 points ago

I think that getting clothes lined by a wire is not a typical injury, unless you are on the set of a Jame Bond film.

The most common injury sustained whilst riding is caused by losing traction and "laying it down" Pretty much everyone will do this at some point if they ride, there is no avoiding this. With the proper gear it usually does not result in serious injury. The second most common accident is caused by novice riders, being novice riders. These can be avoided by not being a moron, as they are usually serious or fatal.

A close second is caused by idiots in cars driving like idiots and killing motoryclists. These can be avoided almost entirely by riding defensively and to some extend by being noisy. The adage "loud pipes save lives" is true to some extent. Usually a loud exhaust is enough to get idiots to stop texting for a few seconds and see wtf is going on.

The people you see splitting lanes at 100 mph wearing flip flops on a Hyabusha are not riders, they are douchebags who deserve to donate their organs to someone with a brain, but bad kidneys.

A GS850 like OP has is an older, heavier, slower bike, he likely does not ride down the road doing a handstand on the seat to impress other douchebags that he rides with. His bike would probably leave a prius in worse shape than the bike if they crashed.

[–]ohhai1234 2 points3 points ago

The proper terminology is 'squid'.

[–]Workslayernumberone 0 points1 point ago

The point I was trying to make is that you can still get severely injured by something simple and generally not dangerous. If you enjoy riding by all means continue but thinking you will not get hurt is foolish.

[–]partycentralsupplies 2 points3 points ago

You WILL GET HURT is my point, but it is not as dangerous as people believe if you are not a moron. If you are stupid then yes you will die. But you can get hurt getting out of bed as well.

I prefer not to take unnecessary risks but I don't want to restrict my enjoyment of life by bubble wrapping myself and wearing cardboard boxes on my feet so I don't get hurt. So the general point is it is a calculated risk.

My husband has been riding his motorcycle for 15 years and has not died. He has had an accident, by hitting a pile of gravel whilst on a turn but he rode home with bruising only because he wears the proper gear. He puts on 20,000+ a year riding. People with a brain can do it safely.

[–]basket_weaver 3 points4 points ago

Exactly. My dad has been riding all his adult life, and my boyfriend had been riding for 13 years. My dad has had one serious accident (t-boned by a car blowing a red light) and could have lost his foot as a result, but at this point is totally fine. My boyfriend slid his bike about 15' on gravel last summer, but because he was wearing full gear just had a stiff knee for a few days. Bikes are dangerous, but as long as you aren't being an idiot and are wearing proper gear, they really aren't the death sentence a lot of people think they are.

[–]philasurfer 3 points4 points ago

T boned on a bike. It is pure chance that your dad is not dead.

[–]basket_weaver 1 point2 points ago

I agree, he is very lucky to not have been more seriously injured or even dead. However, his chances of survival were greatly improved by wearing appropriate gear for riding. The "organ donors" are the ones that think a t-shirt, jeans and runners are going to protect them for more than half a second if they go down.

[–]Doctor_Watson 8 points9 points ago

That is exactly what they are called and for good reason. Most people who deal with trauma of any kind call them by that name. They are great to ride and save money, but the rates of death on them are much higher than a vehicle. If you understand all aspects and find that the risk of death is worth the money saved, then go for it. Otherwise, save your money and your life and go with a cheap car. You'll have more control over your death day.

[–]mudclub 2 points3 points ago

Significantly, while the likelihood of dying in an accident is substantially higher for motorcyclists, the likelihood of being involved in an accident in the first place is quite a bit lower.

[–]gollumullog -5 points-4 points ago

In my opinion this is mostly due to many of the people that ride motorcycles are moronic young men who don't know how to ride.

I have witnessed a few motorcycle accidents, and this was the case in all. I have ridden off and on for 10 years, and many of my friends ride. only 2 of them have been in accidents where there was more than minor damage, the worst was a friend who ran into a cab that u-turned in front of him. That said he was a young man who was a little careless on the bike.

People who know how to ride safely rarely get in accidents.

[–]Voerendaalse 5 points6 points ago

I've understood that a lot of accidents between motorbikes and cars are of the "whoops, didn't see you there, partner"-type, where the car driver has not seen the motorbike and does something so that the motor cycle rider can't escape collision anymore.

[–]gollumullog 1 point2 points ago

The motorcycle needs to always assume every other driver is a complete moron. No accident should be a whoops for a motorcycle rider.

[–]trappedkoala 1 point2 points ago

I always assume that everyone in vehicle with 4, or more, wheels is actively trying to kill me.

[–]Benthetraveler 4 points5 points ago

People who know how to ride safely rarely get in accidents.

Being the best rider in the world doesn't save you from traffic. And when somebody else fucks up your chances to be alright are infinitely higher in a car.

[–]ohhai1234 0 points1 point ago

Having nearly been party to that, I have to say that it's a wash. People are less likely to see me, but with proper situational awareness, I am much more able to avoid them than if I were in a car.

For instance, I can fit between cars in a lane, within reason; I can accelerate and break significantly faster than most cars, which means hightailing it out of a hairy situation quickly; I can, and always try to, create a 'cushion' around me to ensure that I'm never trapped.

[–]Benthetraveler 0 points1 point ago

As much as you like to believe it accident statistics clearly show that bikes are more deadly.

[–]ohhai1234 1 point2 points ago

I'm not saying they aren't more deadly, I am saying that the data that the MSF has accumulated shows that almost all motorcycle accidents were avoidable by following the rules they outline.

So yes, when you dick up, and dickups are easy on two wheels, you will dick up royally... While I could blame a poor driver, the only person that is responsible for a motorcyclists safety is themselves. And that has no bearing on the fact that they are riding with two wheels or four.

[–]gollumullog 0 points1 point ago

"when somebody else fucks up your chances to be alright are infinitely higher in a car." absolutely true.

"Being the best rider in the world doesn't save you from traffic" <- completely disagree with this statement. When riding a motorcycle you have to be constantly aware of traffic, ahead behind, beside you. You have to assume they are going to make the worst decision possible for you and be ready to act accordingly.

Assume the car in front of you is going to pull a u-turn, assume the person coming from the left isn't going to stop for the light. Assume the parked car doesn't see you and opens its door.

You can't remove all risk but you can certainly mitigate it.

[–]Benthetraveler 0 points1 point ago

When riding a motorcycle you have to be constantly aware of traffic, ahead behind, beside you. You have to assume they are going to make the worst decision possible for you and be ready to act accordingly.

So in other words..you ride like you should drive?

[–]gollumullog 0 points1 point ago

to a certain extent, I'm certainly not woried about accidents while driving my car. I am worried about accidents everytime I get on a bike.

[–]Doctor_Watson 12 points13 points ago

Well, it needn't be a matter of opinion. Riders aged over 40 years are over 20 times more likely to die on a motorcycle when compared to someone the same age in a car; and riders aged younger than 40 are 36 times more likely to die on a motorcycle than someone aged the same in a car. see here

Also, 80% of all motorcycle crashes end in death of the driver, compared to 20% with cars, regardless of age. See here.

The statement that "people who know how to ride safely rarely get in accidents" is simply false. It's a game of statistics and those who set out to beat it often wind up with broken limbs or worse. I've ridden for a few years as well, and I never got in an accident, but I don't think that I'm immune because I'm some sort of "safe rider".

Evaluate the risk of riding objectively and contrast it with the cost/benefit analysis of riding and then make your choice. For most who do that, it's not worth it. For others, it is. But to trick yourself into thinking it's not unsafe, then ride because you believe a lie is dangerous.

Safe riding.

[–]ohmygodbees 2 points3 points ago

80% of all motorcycle crashes end in death of the driver is not the most informative statistic. How many of these were wearing their gear? How many were even licensed to ride? Did they buy a bike way too powerful for their skill? Were they stunt riding like idiots in traffic?

[–]StumpyHamilton 6 points7 points ago

Half of all single vehicle motorcycle crashes involve alcohol.

33% of motorcycle crashing riders are not licensed to ride either.

I figure by wearing my gear, being trained, and not drinking, I'm in pretty good shape statistically.

[–]philasurfer 2 points3 points ago

one example.

When you are sitting at a light or in traffic and the guy in an SUV behind you is not paying attention and rear ends you. Nothing you can do to avoid this, it is totally out of your control.

In a car, you have a fender bender. On a motorcycle, you have a broken back.

[–]StumpyHamilton 12 points13 points ago

Not so much. We're not as helpless as you think. Its all about forming habits that keep you safe.

I'm in the habit of always stopping with the bike in first gear. I keep my eye on my mirror watching the car behind me stop. I have my bike more or less pointed between the cars in front of me. If it looks like he's coming in too fast, all I have to do is scoot forward between the cars in front of me and I'm good. Always have an escape plan.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 3 points4 points ago

I don't know why this is being down voted, i think a lot of bikers do this. It's a well known fear of being rear ended at a stop. I'll keep my bike in gear and pointed towards the spaced between lanes for just this reason.

[–]sekkle 0 points1 point ago

Yup. I'm always watching my mirror at a red light and popped into first gear, ready to go.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 0 points1 point ago

His point is valid. You need to have a statistic of likelihood of injury for responsible riders. Take out the alcohol deaths, the no training, the vastly reckless driving, the inadequate gear, no license, etc, and you'd have a much lower statistic. Granted, not as low as a car for the same type of drivers, but much lower than this super high values.

[–]ohhai1234 0 points1 point ago

I want to second this, idiots with superbikes, statistically, are the ones that end up in the hospital or morgue. One should always consider the point of view from motorcycle dealers, which will tell you the ones that end up in pieces back on their floor within a month. They are generally the hot new superbikes that can (and did) go 150MPH+

[–]constipated_HELP 1 point2 points ago

I don't understand why everyone is acting like Doctor_Watson is campaigning against motorcycles. He's not. He even said he was a rider for a bit.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that it's less likely for a car to see you and put you in danger when your vehicle is a fraction of the size. And when you are hit, there is nothing enclosing you to keep you safe.

[–]ohmygodbees 0 points1 point ago

I was talking about your flying corpse being a danger to others.

[–]StumpyHamilton 1 point2 points ago

Well, I think we're mostly just trying to point out that there is a lot more to motorcycle statistics than one or two numbers can tell you. That is primarily because there is a huge number of motorcycle riders out there who don't get any training, don't wear a helmet, and run around half drunk that blow up the statistics.

I spent quite a bit of time going over it before I decided to get a bike, and I think anybody who is thinking about it should as well. It does no good to try to kid oneself that there is no additional risk in riding a bike.

[–]mudclub 1 point2 points ago

Also, 80% of all motorcycle crashes end in death of the driver, compared to 20% with cars, regardless of age.

Bullshit. That will be restricted to reported accidents with police involvement, etc.

[–]gollumullog 0 points1 point ago

I don't think people that are safe drivers are immune, but I think they are statistically far less likely to get into an accident.

Everything in life is unsafe, there is risk and reward in everything. Riding a bicycle is dangerous (more dangerous than riding a motorcycle in a city in my opinion).

I notice you quoted statistics for each example you gave but didn't back up your refutation of: "people who know how to ride safely rarely get in accidents" . Do without facts its opinion on either side...

[–]narf865 1 point2 points ago

Also, 80% of all motorcycle crashes end in death of the driver, compared to 20% with cars, regardless of age

Need to re-read what you are quoting. I thought it was pretty high that 80% of motorcycle accidents end in death. See the actual quote below.

For example, approximately 80 percent of reported motor- cycle crashes result in injury or death; a comparable figure for automobiles is about 20 percent.

[–]StumpyHamilton 0 points1 point ago

You'd think they'd be kind enough to break that 80% down into % injury and % death.

[–]Doctor_Watson -1 points0 points ago

Yes, I mistyped that, thanks.

[–]bfg_foo -2 points-1 points ago

A friend of mine has permanent brain damage from being hit by a truck on the way home from picking up his new motorcycle from the dealership. He had completed a motorcycle safety course before buying the bike.

[–]gollumullog 0 points1 point ago

That really sucks.. but, having a motorcycle safety course under his belt does not necessarily make him a good rider. Sorry to say.

[–]Proven_by_SCIENCE 2 points3 points ago

Of course that's how doctors and nurses see motorcyclists. They work in an ER. ALL they see is injury. Riders (and people in general for that matter) aren't going to waltz into a hospital just to shoot the breeze. They're going in to get fixed up. Im sure they see just as many car crash victims, gang violence victims, domestic abuse victims as they do injured riders.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 2 points3 points ago*

The problem with "donor cycles" is two fold. One is under experienced, over confident, and/or not enough gear riders that take too many risks. When you first start riding, it's exhilarating and it's easy to get carried away. It's like being able to sprint 80 mph. Car drivers don't know what it's like to be able to fly across the ground not surrounded in metal. I love it, but I've definitely had my fair share of screw ups and close calls. Edit 2: It's also very hard to comprehend those high speeds naturally. Human beings don't normally go that fast. It takes learning to realize what that kind of speed really means. Here's an example of a scrape up I had, kind of long, but these kind of things happen: Here

The other half is how careless other drivers are. Mild accidents in a car can be very serious or lethal accidents for a bike. There are plenty of moto forums that have their horror stories of experienced, veteran bikers being taken down by dumb drivers turning left in front, rear ending at stop lights, running lights, and so on. Things that you can't really do much as a rider, even with highly defensive driving. I take solice in the fact that if i were to T-bone someone doing 60 mph, I am much less likely to kill someone, so at least my mistakes won't harm others as much as a car driver's would. But it is risky. That being said, there are scenarios out there where i have avoided things that i wouldn't have in a car. Semi truck tires in the interstate that I have weaved through that cars behind me hit and nearly have accidents, flying off a shoulder that a car could never fit, etc. But risk is part of the business i guess. :(

Edit 1: a lot of folks get out when they have family and such. I won't presume to tell you your business. I'm a single man 21 years of age, my only responsibility is to myself.

[–]Filburt_Turtle 1 point2 points ago

I used to ride a motorcycle in LA. Everyday I would almost get into an accident because people just didn't see me. I reacted and dodged but you can only do that for so long, I knew i was going to get hit eventually. Now I just ride dirt. At least i don't have to worry about other cars.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 0 points1 point ago

I don't know what it's like in a place in LA, I rarely have to deal with any traffic that serious. I ride in Atlanta occasionally. Major metro areas seem like such a commuting nightmare :(

[–]Filburt_Turtle 0 points1 point ago

Man I drove down Broadway, NYC once on a bike, HOLY SHIT, those taxi drivers really don't give a fuck if you're there or not, but they always seem to not hit you...

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 0 points1 point ago

Yeah, probably not a great place to be a pedestrian, bicyclist, or motorcyclist. I'd probably take public transpo in a place like that :/

[–]englad 2 points3 points ago

You can definitely ride in the rain, i live in a very rain-happy part of England and I see bikers all the time

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 0 points1 point ago

I ride in the rain too. Have to be very careful, but it's very cool at night. It's like flying through a star field when your headlight reflects off all those water droplets.

[–]negative_epsilon 4 points5 points ago

I rode a 2009 Ninja 250, and I loved it. 60 mpg, $70 a year in insurance. It was sort of fun to ride, though I ended up hating it because I live in Florida where it's either too hot or too wet.

The problem is that there are two types of riders: Those who have gotten into wrecks, and those who will. And it's never your fault. I didn't believe that, though. I was an incredibly safe driver, and I felt like I had better reaction time than most people so I could swerve and get out of the way and it wouldn't matter. I felt really safe, honestly. 2 months ago, though (The 8th of December, actually) I was on the local highway at night doing the speed limit (Driving home from school), and there was debris in the road. Someone had just sped up, got right in front of me, and immediately hit the brakes to avoid the debris. This caused me to hit my brakes as to not hit him, but the Kia Sorento behind me didn't see me or something and smashed right into me at ~70 mph, when I was probably going 35 or 40. I was really lucky, that I had nothing more than a messed up spine (But no tears or breaks) and some bad road rash on the knees (Couldn't walk for over a month), and while I can't play sports right now it's definitely better than I could have been. I was on a bridge over a lake, too. So many ways I could have died that night-- if I hadn't been wearing my DOT approved helmet I would have.

I guess when you're discussing being frugal, you have to take safety into account. There's a reason no one rides a bicycle in Orlando, you know? I now drive a mid-2000s Japanese 4 cylinder that I feel a lot safer (And comfortable) in. Yeah, I have to pay $60 a month more in gas and $1200 a year more in insurance, but to me that amount of money is definitely worth my life.

[–]TechnoTrain 2 points3 points ago

I agree. I've had a motorcycle as an only vehicle for 3 years. Very, very frugal. Like cheating, almost.

[–]lsc 2 points3 points ago

hah. I need to dig up the photo I have somewhere of a big 2u rackmount server strapped to the back of my motorcycle.

I think the biggest financial problem with motorcycles is the danger; if you factor in the medical expenses, it's probably not cheaper than a car.

The next biggest problem is cargo space. I had a nice big "krauser" brand topcase, but you aren't buying more than a few days worth of food with that. If you want to hit costco, well, you better have a friend with a car.

You are right, of course, about the maintenance, fuel, and purchase price. Also, if you are concerned with having a fast car, or an attractive car? You can get a very nice looking, very fast motorcycle for five or six grand, and it'll get more attention than a sixty thousand dollar car. (It'll accelerate way faster, too)

But yeah, I still think that the thing that makes motorcycles expensive is the health risks.

[–]GNUGeist 0 points1 point ago

As a rider, I agree with the "hidden expense" of health risks. We could go into insurance coverage details if someone else wrecks into you, but it wouldn't factor in the time a wreck would prevent you from working and earning money.

Just something I tangle with on a nice day wondering what it'd be like without putting on all the gear.

[–]pimpybra 1 point2 points ago

I would love to get a bike, but no license, and if I were to do that, I'd go through the official rider course so I don't die (and an insurance discount), so that's a few hundred right there.

Also, winters kinda kill it, but then again, this winter has been pretty mild for a lot of people... so far. But a 33 mile commute with 95% of it on highway also worries me, especially with a lot of driving potentially early morning or late at night (dark).

I've wanted a bike for YEARS now, and it's just not going to happen any time soon, I'm afraid.

[–]TechnoTrain 1 point2 points ago

There are ways to survive the winter on a bike. I encourage you to look further into it since it sounds like you're interested.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 2 points3 points ago*

To be honest, half of winter riding is finding a good suit that is windproof. Wear a warm layer under that and you'll be fine. Mind you don't want to be riding in snow unless you are really sure on what you are doing. I one day hope to get a 2 wheel drive sidecar-bike with studded tires for snow riding. Or just a car. We'll see.

[–]mecharedneck 0 points1 point ago

Urals are cool! I want one, and I wish there were more on the road.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 0 points1 point ago

I don't know about your state, but once I got a permit (written exam), I could ride during daylight hours. Some states require an accredited course, which is highly recommended anyway, but these can be completed in a weekend with motorcycles provided by the instructors. Not too pricey if you shop around. Considering the money you will save on all the BS car stuff you don't have to do, it's not a bad investment. The down payment for a used car could buy a bike outright. No interest, payments, worries, nothing.

[–]MJM83 1 point2 points ago

That's awesome, great job. Is there a website that compares bikes MPG?

[–]dcruzer 2 points3 points ago*

http://www.totalmotorcycle.com/MotorcycleFuelEconomyGuide/index.htm Be careful and make sure you read the cc's of the bikes. Every state has their own laws on what's street legal, what can be driven on what roads, and which cc's is considered a motorcycle.

EDIT: Corrected for information.

[–]ohmygodbees 0 points1 point ago

In illinois, 150cc and up is a motorcycle, and under 150 is class L, so even a 50cc scooter is street legal. I think this is pretty well universal?

[–]dcruzer 0 points1 point ago

I meant street legal as in, legal to drive on all roads (like highways).

I'm wrong, anyway, and I'm gonna correct myself in this post (thanks for making me look it up for my states!) :P

Ex:

MD, below 70cc, it's not street legal on roads with speed limit of 50mph. Above 70cc is a motorcycle. VA, above 50cc, and max speed is over 35mph, it's a motorcycle, and you need an M class.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 0 points1 point ago

Not too sure, you might be able to find comparisons on bike forums of similar style bikes with the same engine size, but I'm not aware of any universal comparison guide. Smaller engine = better mileage.

[–]nsdhanoa 0 points1 point ago

Fuelly is the best place for that. People post their real-world average mpgs. Bikes are just like cars in that there are ways to get astronomical mileage if you are into hypermiling with small bikes, different gearing etc.

If all you ever do is city driving then a small scooter might even be more practical. They have more storage space, are easier to handle in small spaces and can get into the 100s for gas mileage.

[–]chickeeper 1 point2 points ago

I got a Honda ruckus 49cc after selling my wrx. Took the cash and locked into a cd. So far between biking and the ruckus I could careless about Iran oil issue.

[–]ohhai1234 0 points1 point ago

You forgot to mention tires, which wear at about 8 to 12 thousand miles, and are in the $100 to $200 range on average.

[–]Irishpride1919 0 points1 point ago

I have always wanted to do this instead of a car, though I know nothing about maintaining a motorcycle. Do you have any advice for me on how to keep it alive if i get one?

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 1 point2 points ago

Try to find a Hynes or Clymer's manual for it. They are generally written for the amateur mechanic and mine is invaluable to me. Here is one for a CBR. If buy a popular model bike, there will undoubtedly be a forum out there where veterans will tell you the in's and outs of your model. I didn't know much when I started, but you learn over time. Generally speaking, i find cycle mechanics much easier than that of a car. It's also much easier to access most of the components, where often in a car you have to lift multiple units out of the way before you can even start working.

[–]Irishpride1919 0 points1 point ago

Thank you for shoving me in the right direction. Time to do some research.

[–]bahlgan 0 points1 point ago

Hey man, thanks for the info. I know a motorcycle would be a really frugal investment. Unfortunately, the greater risk of injury doesn't suit me at this time. If I decide not to get married, I'll ride bikes for the second half of my life. Thanks for the info, again, man, and shake the haters!

[–]VVaffles 0 points1 point ago

I think you should clarify that this is for a full-time student. It does make some sense for a younger person who is single, lives in a decent climate, and is willing to take some risks. Going to work in a suit or business attire is going to be make this obsolete. I can't even imagine getting dry cleaning, grocery shopping, and any number of other domestic duties done with a motorcycle.

[–]BOFslime -1 points0 points ago

As a motorcycle owner, I don't agree with this, at least not for most. I've seen some people do it, but the reliance on friends in certain situations can be less that ideal. Even in Florida where there's no worry about snow, it rains, and rains quite often. You are exposed to the elements which requires gear, more gear, and lots of preparedness. Other drivers simply don't see you either; People on their phones, people with earbuds in their ears, older people with speed/distance/perception issues, people that legitimately wish to kill you on the road. Its dangerous, requires that you be fully awake and alert and the more miles your commute the more exposed to risk you are each trip. Granted bikers know and accept these terms, but this is a bit different when being used as primary transportation rather than leisure. Cargo space, your bike has none. Even with side saddle bags and rear seat bags, backpacks, etc. You can't really move anything other than a few small objects. Getting groceries is a pain unless you plan on making daily trips for just what you need that night... and that itself isn't frugal in the slightest. If you're also a pet owner, there's absolutely no way you can get your pet to the vet, and that 40lb bag of cat litter, or 50lb bag of dog food isn't getting itself home. Yes you can order online and have this stuff shipped to you, but that has extra costs too, and we still haven't sorted out the vet thing. If you have family that's right out, I don't even need to elaborate here. For everything you absolutely can not do on a bike, you're relying on friends, SO's, etc etc, eventually you'll need someone's car, its a hassle. Really, the only way this can be done is if you're young college student with room mates to help with the groceries. It can be frugal for a very select few, especially in states that don't require insurance on motorbikes, but its not for everyone as most can only and should only use a bike as a toy/hobby and not sell their car on the idea that it will be frugal. Keep the car for when its needed, ride your motorbike to work on the sunny warm days, enjoy both.

[–]Nelson1107 0 points1 point ago

2400 is to much for a 30 year old bike.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 0 points1 point ago

To be honest, I did overpay. But I didn't know much about bikes then, $1800 would have been a better deal.

[–]amitrottl 0 points1 point ago

Jesus, [some] people are fucking assholes about their opinions on motorcycling.

That said, how are the 70s/80s japanese imports on their mileage? They seem to be the cheapest deals. I'm looking to get something smallish, as I am a small guy weighing 125lbs, and definitely cheap. But the gas mileage (and ease of maintenance, too) is important. Any recommendations?

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 0 points1 point ago

They aren't bad. You can pretty much find the balance of power and efficiency you are looking for with the Honda CB series or the Suzuki GS series. They range from 250 cc gas champs to 1200 cc road burning monsters. 250cc would be perhaps too small for highway travel, but a 450cc or larger would do you just fine. I get about 40 mpg in the city on my '82 850cc Susuzki GS for comparison.

[–]d00m3d_d00d 1 point2 points ago

Been riding for years, it makes for a good extra vehicle during the summer but I wouldn't get a motorcycle for frugal reasons. You can't quite drive a motorcycle only and not own a car unless your in a warm climate all year, so you'll still need the car. Extra costs of tires/other seasonal repairs add up fast too. Hell I think I've put over $3k into my 03 CBR600RR in just 2 years/30k miles.

Motorcycling is not a cheap hobby, but its damn awesome if you like to drive long distances for no reason at all just to go somewhere when you're bored. I'd say it evens itself out, it is nice to have a second vehicle after all and it has saved my butt more than a few times.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 0 points1 point ago

I don't know if that is a fair comparison. You can't compares a CBR 600 to a frugal econo car, it would be more fair to compare it to a BMW or Audi. CBR is a performance vehicle, there are going to be more costs associated with that, you can definitely go the cheaper route with a little ninja or nighthawk, or a vintage bike like mine which is cheaper to maintain.

[–]d00m3d_d00d 0 points1 point ago

I actually thought the same thing myself until I bought the OEM manual from the dealer. Its pretty light on maintenance if taken care of right, it doesn't even like high grade octane. I find it cheaper to keep than the 80' CB750c I used to have, parts are far more common and mass-produced.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 0 points1 point ago

Hmm. The more you know. :)

[–]d00m3d_d00d 0 points1 point ago

You should check into a fuel injected bike, its so lovely not having to adjust carbs every year! Most fuel injection bikes began production right around after the year 2000 so you can find them rather cheaply on craigslist.

[–]Pipiru 1 point2 points ago

I really would like an alternative that isn't a motorcycle, and is cheap, like those mini-super efficient cars I saw all over Japan... Motorcycles TERRIFY me. I took the official rider course at the local Kawasaki plant, and freaked the fuck out, I broke down crying twice.

I hope something like this becomes viable in the US someday.

[–]d00m3d_d00d 2 points3 points ago

Try on a dirt bike first, a full size motorcycle is plenty of reason to be a little frightened.

[–]mecharedneck 0 points1 point ago

I don't know why this was downvoted, I learned on an 80, moved up to a 500 and I'm still frightened of something over a 750.

[–]Evan1701 0 points1 point ago

I learned on a 250 at the MSF course, bought a 535, then moved up to a 1200 a few months later (Sportster). It's loud as fuck so no one will never know I was coming, and it has so much pickup I feel like I'm about to launch into space.

[–]mecharedneck 0 points1 point ago

Pipiru probably learned on a 250 too and is terrified. Those kids dirt bikes are like a bicycle with a motor and I think are a great way to start no matter how old you are.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 0 points1 point ago

If i recall correctly, one of those smart car types had a 500cc engine, which is essentially a motorcycle with 4 wheels and a cabin. These are pretty neato, I'd like to see what happens with these in the next few years.

[–]ramp_tram 0 points1 point ago

I've got an '06 Civic and I get 35MPG. You don't have to get a crazy vehicle to get good mileage, just stop flying away from full stops.

[–]IHeartAmber -5 points-4 points ago

I think one is most frugal when dead so having a motorcycle is a great path towards a frugal "life"style.

[–]GammaStorm 3 points4 points ago

I love these kind of posts from people who obviously have never driven a motorcycle who expose their own ignorance and fear of them. It reminds of arguments from people on 'why' someone would want to shoot guns for recreation and have them in their homes. I've driven/owned a number of sport bikes for almost 30 years now. I've had FAR more close calls in my cars verses my motorcycles. In fact I've 0 accidents on a motorcycle and have been rear ended 5 times in a car. One thing I can say with confidence is that riding a motorcycle has made me an even better driver in a car. On a bike you can't be fumbling for crap, or chatting on a phone or any number of distractions people do in a 4 wheel cage. I have to be eminently aware of everything going on around me in a 300+ ft radius and always planning my 'out' in the event shit goes bad. I have a 25 year clean, accident free, ticket free driving career to prove it.

[–]vanmillion 0 points1 point ago

...what does this have to do with guns?

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 0 points1 point ago

He is equating your fear of bikes to many people's fear of firearms. If your only experience with both is Son's of Anarchy, then naturally you are going to be afraid. Real life doesn't really validate these fears to the fullest extent.

[–]GNUGeist 0 points1 point ago

The recreational guns argument discussion goes very similar and I've seen this discussion amongst my friends.

A gun is by nature, a killing machine. Owning a gun requires paying attention to maintenance and safety/security. If someone isn't interested in shooting, there isn't much chance that they will.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 0 points1 point ago

I agree with this exactly. I don't think it's possible to do most of the stupid distracted crap that car drivers do on a bike. Just try and fall asleep on a motorcycle. Or put on makeup. Not going to happen. You have little choice but to pay attention.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 0 points1 point ago

The other side of the coin is motorcyclists are less likely to kill someone else. Drive your Ford 350 and slay others around you with no concern for others. At least on a motorcycle, I'm not nearly as likely to ruin someone else's life.

[–]ramp_tram -2 points-1 points ago

You realize that there are vehicles between donorcycles and F350s, right?

[–]GNUGeist 1 point2 points ago

From his post history, its obvious he does - but the physics of a motorcycle carries less inertia than most cars (not sure about smart cars but they are dangerous too). Safety is the main concern while riding a motorcycle and the reason for this comment-thread.

[–]CHICOandtheMAN -1 points0 points ago

I want to go this way (motorcycles were my only transportation in high school and college), but honestly, it makes it very difficult to score with chicks. The novelty wears off in 20 minutes, the attitude is that responsible adults have cars, they don't want hair messed up, can't man up in the rain, and so on.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 0 points1 point ago

I don't know about this. I'm not raking in the ladies with my 30 year old clunker, but I see plenty of harley's and CBR's alike with women on the back. Plenty of chicks dig it, some don't too. To each their own. Not to mention the women that ride their own bikes :D !

[–]CHICOandtheMAN 0 points1 point ago

That your 30 year old clunker does not pull chicks does not mean that a motorcycle is not also a problem. We were not discussing $20,000 Harleys, and actually, you don't see very many of those with women on the back. When you do, ask the woman of she would be happy with a Harley, or a 1980 Virago as her only means of transport. Plenty of chicks don't dig it. Plenty of chicks dig short leisurely rides in July, but they don't want to go from Eugene to Seattle for a football game in November. They do not want to do the grocery shopping on a motorcycle, and they don't want to go to work as a paralegal in a skirt on the back of a motorcyle wearing a helmet. There is a difference between a hobby and a lifestyle. If you consider women who own their own motorcycles as your potential dates, you are fishing in an astonishingly small pool.

Instead, why not get a 1997 Corvette? You still get to consider yourself frugal because it costs only $15,000 (half the price of a new Camry), it gets 29 MPG (more than a Camry), cheap used parts are abundant in wrecking yards. $10,000, 60 months at 2.99% $179 per month. And it won't cockblock you.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 0 points1 point ago

You know, it wouldn't be difficult to have both a car and a bike. I have just the one because I'm a part time working (at best) full time college student. $15,000 might as well be a fortune to me, I could not justify spending that much on a car at this point in my life. As far as being cock blocked, many students in college have nothing, so a motorcycle is not the worst thing out there

Also, I'm not sure where you are getting this idea that motorcyclists have problems picking up women. Not my experience. Sure you see plenty of solo riders, but plenty of people drive their cars alone too. I've never had the bike be a detriment as far as dating, and have had it be a benefit. I've had girls have a blast riding with me up in the windy mountain roads in a cool SC summer evening. Great scenery. Chicks love scenery bro.

[–]CHICOandtheMAN 0 points1 point ago

Agree, if you are in college, a motorcycle is enough. It was not a problem for me when I was in college. But when you are 40, the 35 year old stewardesses you meet at happy hour at El Torito see things differently than they did when they were in college. I have a 1997 Corvette, which is frugal, but I would not mind getting rid of it and getting a motorcycle because I don't think a $15,000 car is $10,000 better than a $5000 motorcycle at this point in my life. The problem is the puss. Chicks love the scenery occasionally and under specific circumstances, cool SC summer evening. But chicks don't want to be forced to enjoy the scenery from a motorcycle day after day when it is raining and cold and they want to wear a skirt. Motorcyclists don't have a problem puling puss, people whose only transportation choice is a motorcycle have a problem pulling puss. If you have a bike for occasional use in July, and a car for long trips, winter, dropping Ms. $100 Haircut off at work in the morning, then you win. And you might not know this because you are a student but in 20 years women are going to see you as juvenile if you don't have a car. They don't like juvenile. Right now you are trying to impress 20 year old girls and it is working. No problem. But it 20 years you are going to try to impress women, women with initials after their names, mortgages, parents in nursing homes, children in jail, and they do not want college boys on motorcycles (except now and again on a cool SC summer evening).

Didn't you just say you have only a motorcycle because you work part-time at best, but at another point in you life... See?

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 0 points1 point ago

As you said, most motorcyclists middle aged do have both a car and a motorcycle. I never intended to never have a car. I think it would my ideal scenario would be a bike and a small pickup, that way I can do all the things that i need to.

Anyway, I thought this was r/frugal, not r/seduction. I proposed a way of saving money, not a way of being comfortable and attractive to random women.

[–]CHICOandtheMAN 0 points1 point ago

Anyway, I thought this was r/frugal, not r/seduction.

OMG! Suh-nap!

[–]vanmillion -1 points0 points ago*

CONS: Greater risk of injury i suppose. If you don't have health insurance, this may be a no go.

I think it'd be more worth mentioning the 35 times greater chance of DEATH on a motorcycle accident as opposed to being in a car. Funerals typically aren't very frugal.

I'm not saying motorcycles don't have their place, but for everyday commuting in traffic...a lot of risk to save a little money AND not be able to go anywhere if it's raining.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] -2 points-1 points ago

I've mentioned this elsewhere, and was confirmed by someone else who had statistics, but 2/3rd of motorcycle accidents are caused by the other driver. Call me idealistic, but I'd rather not be the one killing someone with my recklessness. It costs a lot to defend a vehicular manslaughter charge, go to prison, get sued, etc.

[–]ramp_tram -4 points-3 points ago

It's currently about 20f out. There's no fucking way I'm riding a motorcycle in that.

Also, I don't think you'd do that well in the first 3-4 hours of storms when the plow trucks aren't out yet. My Civic, on the other hand, has no problems with any of that.

Also, good luck bringing groceries home.

If you live somewhere where it never rains and there's no traffic, maybe a motorcycle is a good investment. But if you live in the first world it's really not.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 4 points5 points ago

You can ride in the rain. I have a great 2 piece rainsuit and I ride year round. I don't have a car, so if I don't ride, I don't go places. It may not be an option for you, but don't be so quick to dismiss the notion outright.

[–]ramp_tram -4 points-3 points ago

You can ride in the rain.

I love how you ignored 98% of my comment and just replied to my use of the word rain.

if I don't ride, I don't go places.

Work. The store. School. You're in /r/frugal not r/motorcycles. We have places to go and things to do. We can't just not go anywhere for 6+ months when it's freezing, icy, and snowy.

but don't be so quick to dismiss the notion outright.

How do you pay rent, food bills, get the food, or anything else if you just can't go anywhere half the year?

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 2 points3 points ago*

More places than you think have conditions where year round riding is possible. Obviously it won't work for you, but this is a valid option for many.

Edit: To address the other "98%", I have often ridden in sub freezing. I ride home on the interstate at midnight regularly and it will be in 20's. If there is no snow on the ground, it's pretty easy to ride. At least in the SouthEast, even if it does snow, you don't have to worry. Most business close and no one shops for those 1-2 days until the roads are plowed. It's not worth the money here for people to winterize their vehicles for 1-2 days every 2 years, so they just wait till the plows do their thing.

[–]ramp_tram -5 points-4 points ago

It's really not.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 1 point2 points ago

If you say so guy. I live in SC, anywhere south of here would have year round riding. So most of the southeast. All of the deep south. TX, AZ, UT, SoCal, New Mex. Not to mention any folks not in the US, so Mexico, all of central america. In fact, motorcycles are extremely popular in India for just this reason.

[–]ramp_tram -4 points-3 points ago

Florida gets horrible zero visibility downpours all summer.

Places as far south as you, and further get ice storms in the winter.

You also haven't answered the question: HOW. DO. YOU. GET. GROCERIES.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 2 points3 points ago*

Well, if you have zero vis. storms, it's not really safe to drive a car either, is it? Regardless of your vehicle, if you can't see where you are driving it would be prudent to pull over and wait. I've mentioned groceries elsewhere, but I rarely have to go more than once a week because of how much I can haul. Here's an example, last time I went this is what I carried between a large, external frame backpack that I strapped to the passenger seats and two luggage boxes:

1 Cantaloupe

1 3lb bag of onions

1 gallon milk

5lbs flour

2 lb bag of carrots

1 stalk celery

12 pack soda

5 cans of vegetables/soup

1 bag 10" tortillas

1 2 lb bag oragnes

1 3 lb bag of apples

Edit: Forgot 1 bell pepper, garlic, small olive oil,a few jalapenos, and taco sauce. I probably forgot something else, but that was last saturday, and I won't be going back until today or tomorrow for more groceries.

[–]GNUGeist 0 points1 point ago

lol, in response to ramp_train.

http://memegenerator.net/instance/14065937

Anyways WaffleMoose, don't forget luggage racks and boxes are an additional expense. A complete rack system for my 92 Kawasaki EX500A is approximately $400 that I don't have. I'm considering welding my own instead.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 2 points3 points ago

I built my own luggage out of 50 cal. ammo cans. Waterproof and spacious, paid about 60 for cans plus hardware. They lock.

[–]ramp_tram -3 points-2 points ago

So, you go grocery shopping every day?

You realize you're in the frugal subreddit, right?

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 0 points1 point ago*

No, i go about every 1, 1.5 half weeks. that is a lot of food for me, not to mention all the other things that accumulate in the pantry/fridge. I don't tend to shop at bulk places because I tend to eat mostly fresh vegetables. Not really frugal in the short run, but will cost me less in health problems in the long run. Not going to buy 50lbs of onion.

[–]ramp_tram -2 points-1 points ago

Is this [2] /r/frugal? At least in my scenario, getting a car that would last more than a year was not an option.

My first car was an '89 Accord from a car auction with electric everything. It ran just fine, and lasted me 3 years. I paid $500 for it.

You may save a few bucks on the car, but you're losing out on being able to buy groceries and shit from places like BJ's and Costco for long term savings.

[–]WaffleMoose[S] 0 points1 point ago

3 years isn't very long. I'll probably have this bike until i get a job after i graduate this spring and buy a better one or another car. I got it with 11,000 miles on it. they are known to get 100,000 miles. I probably have another decade for this bike as a daily rider, or for the rest of my life when i get something else to replace it.

[–]ramp_tram -3 points-2 points ago

3 years isn't very long.

I sold the car for $2500 and bought a nicer car for $2000 that I drove for another two years before selling that for $5k. I bought a brand new Civic in '05 that I plan on driving for at least another decade.

I don't know why you're trying to be so dishonest in this discussion. You were proven wrong. A two wheeled vehicle is not more frugal than a four wheeled vehicle, unless you're comparing an H3 to a moped.

[–]GNUGeist 1 point2 points ago*

You sold a '89 Accord for $2500 ?!? How much work did you do on that thing to make such a profit? Speaking of dishonest, what are you hiding from us that allows you to turn at least a 100% profit on every vehicle you own?

I shall admit, auctions are plenty of fun. However, your hijacking this thread and repeating your questions is hardly productive.

[–]ramp_tram -5 points-4 points ago

How much work did you do on that thing to make such a profit?

Nothing. It ran fine, was power everything, and leather seats.

what are you hiding from us that allows you to turn at least a 100% profit on every vehicle you own?

I get vehicles from car auctions, have my mechanic check them over, drive them for a while, and sell them to people who want cars.

However, your hijacking this thread and repeating your questions is hardly productive.

I'm not hijacking, I'm proving that OP is full of shit. You can't get groceries with a motorcycle. You can't buy in bulk with a motorcycle. You have to have everything shipped to you if you want to buy things like furniture and electronics.

Motorcycles are not "big picture" frugal. You might save gas money compared to a large truck, but you're spending more money everywhere else.

[–]GNUGeist 1 point2 points ago

If I may quote this subreddit's fine mantra:

The civil place to share tips and ideas for honest and practical waste-reduction, debt reduction, budgeting, saving, fix-it-up, and do-it-yourself. The primary goal here is about how to think about consumption and how you approach resource allocations.

and

Frugality isn't just about finding the best price for something. Remember it doesn't cost you anything to be nice.

What I am pointing out is that you are basing your "big picture" frugality of cars based upon your experience buying and selling cars. Motorcycles don't carry as much value as a car. I bought my EX500A for 500 USD and I might be able to sell it for 800 USD if I push it. The resale value just isn't there.

WaffleMoose is in college and on a budget. This is his /r/frugal thread about how his money is spent. You opinion is valued, just as your points are valid. Lets just keep this in perspective and remember not to be so quick to judge others.

[–]ramp_tram -3 points-2 points ago

What I am pointing out is that you are basing your "big picture" frugality of cars based upon your experience buying and selling cars.

If that's what you're pointing out you're wrong. I paid $20k for my Civic in '05, paid it off in '06, and straight up own it. It doesn't matter if I still had my first Accord (the guy I sold it to is still driving it every day), the fact remains that you cannot drive a motorcycle during a snow storm, when there's ice on the ground, or during most non-sunny weather. You also cannot buy in bulk to save if you have to fit everything into a tiny ass backpack.

[–]GNUGeist -1 points0 points ago*

Make an end of this! You are on repeat and making the same points but blatantly ignoring every bit of courtesy thrown your way. I'm tired of respecting your opinions!

I cannot drive my Camry in a snow/ice storm. If there is more than 6 inches of snow I'm bottoming out, and if there is any ice, I have to slow down to a crawl not to rear-end someone else. I cannot move furniture in my car. There is a lot a car can and cannot do as well. Although a FWD Subaru sounds kinda nice. The only point made is that I can buy bulk in my car and that its a discomfort to ride in the rain (but I still do it for commuting anyways.) If the roads don't have snow or ice on them, I ride (approx .18 gallons @ 65) to work (approx 11.7) rather than driving (approx .377 gallons @ 31 mpg). Five commutes a week, 52 weeks a year really does add up.

You've been tossing out 80% of whats been said, and distorting the other 20%! Want references? HERE