this post was submitted on
56 points (84% like it)
69 up votes 13 down votes

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own!

all 79 comments

[–]PauliEffect 36 points37 points ago

You aren't being cowardly your being strategic - good for you. We need people in all professions, organizations and governments. Your activism can begin simply by having rational conversations with your co-workers. Everytime you challenge their assumptions and help them think outside of the left-right political spectrum (whether they know it or not) you are achieving great success for all of us.

I can appreciate people questioning your choice of career however there is certainly going to be nuclear r&d whether you're involved or not. Maybe that's exactly where we need you. I occasionally lament my black blocing, squatting, getting arrested days - then I remember they were the greatest years of my life. In my opinion your making a huge sacrifice for all of us. Being an anarchist can be mighty lonely without the solidarity and mutual aid of your brothers and sisters. I don't think your in the closet, I think your undercover.

[–]closetanarchist[S] 2 points3 points ago

I like the thought of being undercover! (Cue Mission Impossible theme) It is pretty tough sometimes being the only person who feels this way, but I do think that I can do a lot more for my causes if I stay on my current track. And I will remember to have those rational conversations. Thanks for your input.

[–]gnkbot 3 points4 points ago

I like the way PauliEffect is thinking here. Winning minds is important. A high-ranking nuclear engineer is more likely to be listened to by the public than some coffeehouse anarchist. (guilty)

[–]gnkbot 16 points17 points ago*

Comp sci student here, feel your pain to some extent. All my anarchist friends are liberal arts majors, and all my tech friends are apathetic. It's really a shame. Anarchy needs more technical minds IMO; it's as much of an engineering problem as anything else. We need people to design free networks, sustainable agricultural systems, etc. I tried explaining to one of my anarchist friends how the small-scale manufacturing movement could totally uproot current systems of power, but she just threw up her hands and said it was too technical for her.

I would think carefully about what you really want. Do you really want to support this system, or are you just taking the path of least resistance? No one said anarchy was easy. One of the most insidious parts of our society is that everyone can pretend they are blameless, and "just trying to get along". You'll get resistance from your peers, your family, everyone. If you're like most engineers I know, you like using your mind, and engineering is a vent for that. You don't have to use it to support the system, though. Are there any other fields of science/engineering that you're interested in?

[–]spedmyster 7 points8 points ago*

I know exactly what your talking about. The development of the Global Village Construction Set by Open Source Ecology would have enormous implications. As a chemical engineer, I want to start developing waste management systems in which almost all material is completely recycled, using biological means and solar energy to break down waste into raw chemical feedstocks that can then be used to produced raw materials for all sorts of services. Imagine every town capable of producing most of it's own materials from its own waste, capable of converting scrap metal back into usable pieces of metal ceramic materials from soil and dirt, etc.

Perhaps we should start forming a network of anarchist or anarchist-leaning comp sci majors, engineers, researchers, etc. Start developing the technology and the systems that would facilitate the existence of anarchocommunist (or whatever) towns.

Fortunately there are plenty of permaculture enthusiasts, "hackers", engineers that might be ignorant of anarchist ideas but are nonetheless sympathetic to causes like Open Source ecology, the development of sustainable agricultural systems as you said, etc. We could really get something going here. I'm out in western Mass where people love permaculture, so I'm going to try to get a network going out here. Perhaps get some connects over at MIT to help form a broader open source engineering coalition. Hmmm...

[–]allnightgaragesale 2 points3 points ago

Upvote for "Open Source Ecology."

[–]gnkbot 1 point2 points ago

That GVCS is AWESOME. I've been looking for something like that for a while. Here's the TED talk:

http://vimeo.com/30152906

spedmyster I'm in Boston. I don't have any connections with MIT or anything, but I'd love to be a part of this kind of movement. Shoot me a message.

[–]AndreasBWagner 1 point2 points ago

I'm a CompSci student in boston. An anarchist hackerspace collective of some sort is something I would love to work on. I'm currently more into the software, my current project is a distributed p2p operating system. I will however look for "physical computing" applications for the OS when I get the distributed p2p filesystem done.

Anyways, I think there are many hackerspaces out there but not many with our specific political aims.

[–]closetanarchist[S] 2 points3 points ago

I see what you're saying. But to be honest, working in the field of alternative energy isn't as easy of a field as most people would think it to be, given that there is a current monopoly of fossil fuels and those people don't want energy to be safer/cheaper. As for the other fields of science and engineering, I want to do research; there's very few opportunities in my areas of expertise for labs that don't require security clearances.

[–]sync0pate 2 points3 points ago

All my anarchist friends are liberal arts majors, and all my tech friends are privileged and apathetic.

There's a fair bunch of programmers and tech folks in here.

I'm a programmer as my day job..

[–]gnkbot 1 point2 points ago

Acknowledged. I'm not saying there are no anarchists in the tech field; it's just more sparse. /r/anarchism is a special subset of the anarchist community, and there are probably more tech folks on here.

[–]sync0pate 2 points3 points ago

Fair enough.

That's not really my experience though, I've found the technology field to be at least very left leaning with a decent share of anarchists and other radical socialists.

I mean.. what about the free software movement for a start? That's fairly well in line with our principles! :)

[–]valadus 1 point2 points ago

I personally am dual-enrolled in high school and community college where I am studying game design. I plan to go back after I graduate to get a networking degree. I am anarchist and I am lucky enough to gave a lot of friends who I can talk about my views with despite being in the bible belt. I agree that we need more technical minded anarchists. Even though I can talk freely about it, I am one of very few anarchists in a computer, related degree.

[–]stinkyfoot 0 points1 point ago

small-scale manufacturing movement could totally uproot current systems of power, but she just threw up her hands and said it was too technical for her.

My career aspiration is to be active and help strengthen this very thing. But my professional peers would not take me seriously if I ran around with a black flag stapled to my messenger bag.

There's also the fact that the whole, randomly destructive feeling of standard anarchism doesn't really appeal to the type of builder/creative that I associate with. We're more like, lets make shit and let the rest of the world go to hell type because we all know that the establishment is going to eat itself from the inside anyway.

[–]MikeBoda 5 points6 points ago*

You might be interested in the biography of J Robert Oppenheimer. He was perhaps the most important nuclear physicist in US history in terms of contributing to both theory and actual development/engineering. He lead the Manhattan project.

Oppenheimer was a leftist and openly supported and raised funds for our side in the Spanish Civil War. His associations with socialists coupled with Cold War paranoia eventually lead to him being blacklisted and interrogated by the US government.

[–]budgie 4 points5 points ago*

They weren't nuclear physicists, but cyberneticists Stafford Beer and Grey Walter were socialists/anarchists and their politics did influence their work. Beer in fact worked with Salvador Allende's elected socialist government in Chile to develop a national real-time computerized system (Cybersyn) to run the entire Chilean economy. All that came to end of course with the "first 9/11".

Their history and those of other important cyberneticist are chronicled in a great book by Andrew Pickering titled The Cybernetic Brain

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

It's my understanding that Cybersyn never "[ran] the entire Chilean economy". In fact, it's far from clear to me that the Cybersyn project was ever functional. The entire endeavor had an unnervingly Potemkin-like patina to it, even up to the snazzy control room with fake slides and buttons that literally lead to nothing. However you view the moral merits of an attempt to "run an entire economy", you surely must appreciate the computational complexity of the task (cf. the "socialist calculation debate"), and ask yourself how plausible it is that the Chilean economy was governed by a computer less powerful than an iPhone.

[–]closetanarchist[S] 0 points1 point ago

I love Oppenheimer, and I am familiar with most of his work and political leanings. I will, however, look more into him in this new light.

[–]Ginjeet 7 points8 points ago

I was. Came out. Lost some friends and found some new. Had some arguments in my family. Pretty much the same thing with atheism. I'm happy with my decision.

[–]afireatseaparks 6 points7 points ago

I don't talk about anarchism much because I'm still pretty new to it, and I don't want to further the stereotype of anarchism being a poorly thought out ideology for the ignorant and angst-ridden. While I've made up my mind that I'm socialist, anti-authoritarian, and anti-capitalism, I'm still exploring different subsets of anarchism and answers to the difficult questions raised by the idea of a society without government. The few (liberal) friends I've attempted the conversation with have been somewhat dismissive and condescending, and I didn't have an arsenal of truth bombs at the ready, so I'm holding off until I can present a more educated argument.

Also, it's comforting to read this thread and see that other anarchists have jobs they find problematic in relation to their ideals. Makes me feel less alone in struggling with that personal conflict.

[–]The Anarchist FighterEscarabajo 1 point2 points ago

I'm not even sure I'd consider myself an anarchist yet at this time, also for not wanting to be poorly thought-out, though a good deal seems to make sense to me, I'm still learning how to put it together. I too feel comforted by reading this thread and by your reply. :)

[–]kropotkinbakunin 4 points5 points ago*

You are not alone, I have had to hide the fact that I'm an anarchist just so I could get work. I have worked in a bank counting money, after that I worked for the same bank answering phones, and now I'm working for an auction house (that sells fur to rich Chinese businessmen).

All are places that would never hirer an anarchist, but it didn't stop me from going to protests or taking part in the anarchist movement where I live. I have been arrested during protests, but have never stood trial. I know the police knows that I'm an anarchist (I have a police report on myself that I got from a lawyer).

The point being, don't be paranoid, just be fucking careful who knows.

[–]closetanarchist[S] 1 point2 points ago

I have been arrested during protests, but have never stood trial. I know the police knows that I'm an anarchist

That's very impressive that you stood up for your beliefs that way. However, I can tell you right away that there is no way I could work in nuclear with an arrest record :P So I'm pretty paranoid, unfortunately.

[–]efmac 2 points3 points ago

'Pretty paranoid' is different from 'necessarily careful.' Sounds like you're more of the latter.

[–]DrKuha 6 points7 points ago

You don't have to use the word "anarchist" when you're debating someone.

[–]Anarchists_Love_Cats 4 points5 points ago

I think most of us live a sort of double life when it comes to work. I work for a mainstream news organization (a big one) and most of my comrades don't see what I have to worry about, but somehow I don't think it would go over well if my superiors discovered I were an anti-authoritarian revolutionary syndicalist.

[–]DogBotherer 2 points3 points ago

I chose anarchism over a very well-padded upper-middle-class career (as a lawyer). It was kind of dumb and kind of fun, but it is most certainly 100% irreversible... And I'm definitely excluded from lots of places that once would've been open to me to pervert and corrupt (or to be perverted and corrupted by...)

It's a choice, you make it and you live with it. For good or for ill. But I certainly don't begrudge people who can maintain radicalism in the face of a conspiracy of conservatism. I just doubt most people's ability to do so however much they might believe they can...

[–]closetanarchist[S] 2 points3 points ago

It is certainly difficult at times, but I have been learning to phrase my ideas in more "politically-correct" terminology, and people do seem to respond better to it.

[–]DogBotherer 1 point2 points ago

Sure, change your terminology as necessary, just never adopt their world view and limits of what's acceptable. Nothing worse than even the most liberal of limitations.

[–]LadyOnAvon 1 point2 points ago

I think it's different in law than in science. As a lawyer and an anarchist, you're constantly recognizing that your utility to society is based on a fictitious and arbitrary system. At least that's how I feel now that I'm wrapping up law school. Perhaps I'd feel otherwise if I'd planned to do criminal defense work.

[–]DogBotherer 1 point2 points ago

That was my field (criminal defence), but nonetheless, whilst I still love the idea of law in the abstract, I was constantly driven to see it was their law in practice and always would be.

[–]MagonistaRevolt 1 point2 points ago

I'm curious about other closet anarchists, but I'm also curious about what kind of work you strive to do with such credentials. What liberatory projects do you see yourself participating in with a skillset as a nuclear engineer?

I understand that you don't have to have a job congruous with your politics necessarily. I understand working at McDonald's (proletarian jobs that one does to survive), or working in academia (the privelege of having an academic pursuit and pursuing knowledge for its own sake). But I'm curious if you see any potential in what you do for communization/negation?

[–]closetanarchist[S] -2 points-1 points ago

I want to work with alternative energy and removing our dependence on fossil fuels, which are horrendous for the environment and monopolize our society.

[–]MagonistaRevolt 1 point2 points ago

And you see nuclear energy as a viable alternative to fossil fuels? Call me old fashioned, but I don't see it. Yucca Mountain, Chernobyl. Also, Jesus H Christ, what about Pine Ridge??

[–]azripah 1 point2 points ago

Chernobyl was a plant of horrifyingly poor design being run by an unstable despotic regime that was well past its prime, and even that should be of no risk whatsoever inside a few decades. Chernobyl was basically as bad as nuclear disasters can get.

You're going to have to link me to Pine Ridge, I've not heard of it and couldn't find anything seemingly relevant on google.

Nuclear waste is one of the biggest FUD tools of the anti-nuclear crowd. The vast majority of waste (all of it I think) can be re-proccessed and burned again with existing technology, until it's down to something like 1% of what's currently being stored in places like Yucca Mountain, and I think that that 1% waste would only have a half life of a couple decades. We're essentially sticking highly valuable nuclear fuel in mountains because our old-ass reactors can't handle it, they need to be fed enriched fuel (higher U-235 content) due to old designs from a bygone era. Check out traveling wave reactors for more on re-using waste as fuel in power generation.

Nuclear is a logical choice for power generation in stable areas without an abundance of solar, such as most of Europe and the northern US and Canada.

[–]MagonistaRevolt 1 point2 points ago

What about the current state of "democracy" in the United States, in your anarchist opinion, makes you think that the US isn't "an unstable despotic regime that was well past its prime?" If a prerequisite for nuclear power is stability and democracy, what on earth are you doing promoting it now?

Further, uranium mining is an act of colonization on the people of the Pine Ridge Reservation, who are among the poorest and most exploited people in our country. If you intend to run anything on nuclear power, you must first put another nail in the coffin of Native Americans, ousting them from the only lands they have left and poisoning their bodies in order to mine that noxious stuff. http://www.culturechange.org/cms/content/view/336/65/

It reminds me of arguments for "clean coal." Sure, it might burn cleaner than it used to, and our cities might not be blanketed in ash, but the extraction is incredibly destructive to environment and community.

[–]azripah 0 points1 point ago

No uranium mining needs to be done for a long while. We've got enough nuclear waste to run Generation IV reactors for decades, and when we that's all depleated to lead, thorium is the logical choice.

As bad as it is, the US isn't as bad as the USSR in the mid-to-late 80's, and I was talking geologically/meteorologically stable anyway. Sane reactor designs do not help in building nukes.

[–]forstudentpower 0 points1 point ago

Nuclear power is one of the purest examples of monopoly capitalism out there. If you want a nuclear power plant, it's almost guaranteed to be built by a massive war profiteer, and it's going to be a huge, centralized facility, with power sent hundreds of miles over an inefficient electrical grid.

One big advantage of solar and wind is that they have the potential (and partial realization already) of truly decentralized power production, which is both structurally and economically much closer to anarchist values.

[–]azripah 0 points1 point ago

Not really, that's just how they're normally built. There's no reason I'm aware of why nuclear technology couldn't be scaled down to the community level, and RTGs could even be used on a household level.

[–]RosieLalala 1 point2 points ago

I understand. I work high-security events like the Olympics and certain high-stakes political gatherings - while simultaneously protesting them in my off hours. It's is a very fine line to walk. It started because I like infiltration (and have always been good at it) and then my employer kept me because I do a good job. I like the work and so I don't really want to have it go away any time soon. I also need to be able to cross international borders at the drop of a hat.

The way that I've figured it out is to show how I want the world to be. I help to run a community space because I think that they are an important demonstration of the potential of how it should be. I help to run a community food programme for the same reason. I host clothing swaps and craft nights and distribute zines because the knowledge should be shared. I do court/prison support (depending on where in the system folks happen to be). In all, I try to be the change that I want to see in the world.

I figure that there are two prongs - the part that demonstrates a better world is possible, and the other part that goes out and fights for it. While I support the fight, I prefer to demonstrate the potential. When I'm old I plan on becoming a raging granny and a part of the red hat society - that way I can fight for change. But for now, I'd like to introduce people to what we could all share - a future of communities and social responsibility.

[–]MikeBoda 2 points3 points ago*

I know anarchists that work on physics and chemistry projects at state funded universities and top national labs. I've personally worked on fabricating electronics--in the private sector-- for products used by the military and national labs.

You'd be surprised at what you can get away with. Look at what Chomsky was able to do while being more or less funded by the Pentagon for more than half a century. You often have more autonomy to express your politics when you are employed by the state than you do in the private sector. For profit corporations are much more anti-union and have no concern with tenure protections.

Remember that when you are teaching or doing publicly funded research, you might have some chance to work on some science or technology that could benefit your fellow workers without turning a profit for the ruling class. When you work for private industry, you literally can't exist unless you are enriching the shareholders at the expense of the working class.

[–]datoo 2 points3 points ago

I'm not exactly in the closet out of necessity, but I've lost the desire to talk politics with most people and I've become disillusioned with the movement due to how I've been treated by many anarchists over the years. I think I'm much happier for it. In the end ideology doesn't matter, actions do, especially being a decent human.

[–]shinobiboix 0 points1 point ago

I hope it is not too personal but are you a female/homosexual/minority/etc by any chance?

[–]datoo 0 points1 point ago

No, straight white male. Why?

[–]shinobiboix 0 points1 point ago

"I've become disillusioned with the movement due to how I've been treated by many anarchists over the years." I've read of said groups leaving due to discrimination/oppression.

[–]datoo 1 point2 points ago

No, it's more just that I'm somewhat of a loner to begin with and I get turned off by the cliquishness of a lot of anarchists. Also, I dealt with a lot of people who think their shit doesn't stink because they are righteous anticapitalist warriors, while treating those around them with utter disregard. I could go on about this for a long time, suffice to say that I'm in a much better place where I am now, focusing more on trying to fix my every day personal problems and less on politics.

[–]pzanon 1 point2 points ago

why do you want to be a nuclear researcher? i'm not challenging that, i'm just curious.

i think what's important is don't let other people tell you what you want. that's i think the most important thing. think really simply about what you want changed in the world, and the best strategies to do that. of course living a happy, fulfilled life is important in the meantime, but that's the way i approach it. i was growing increasingly disgusted with myself as i let myself get swept up in a career path until i just let myself go. it's not even a matter of taking a path of least resistance, it's a matter of being a dreamer, and working toward your dreams. you've got 50 or so years left. make them fucking awesome.

although most everyone i know are aware i'm some sort of commie scum (since highschool, i s'pose, though i didn't really know what shit meant then), i definitely raised a few eyebrows in my family when i changed from a "very promising" (ie many digit) career path to an ill-defined life plan. i explained it to my family in terms of the philosophy of simple living, which is something pretty damn difficult to argue with. really, you can't argue with something that's so simple and voluntary, it must be right.

[–]closetanarchist[S] 3 points4 points ago

I want to work in alternative energy and remove our dependence on fossil fuels, which is destroying the environment and monopolizing society. I have other big dreams, but currently I want to work to make our power generation source much more efficient and inexpensive.

[–]pzanon 0 points1 point ago

glad you want to work in your field. is there a way to work more independently than a government owned lab, like for some sort of non-profit, or alternatively-funded small research group? (i know nothing about your field, so this could be a stupid question) also, if you view this more as a temporary gig for experience and money to live on then that's probably reasonable --- take what you can get, etc

how much have you worked so far in your field, outside of college? personally, although i like what i do (i have a cs degree), and have various ideas on how to improve my field in ways that impact society (esp. education), what really pisses me off is that research/innovation is about 80% useless in a capitalist society. that is, there are already better solutions, it's just corporations stopped them from being used, or only fund innovations in making money and not making the world better. even research that isn't corporately funded just goes unused since there is no way to monetize this invention, or just as often, there is ways, but existing corporations feel threatened by that and so they buy up patents / key people to keep their business plan from becoming endangered. like, you can spend your life researching amazing new technology, and without social change, it's going to go in a trashcan somewhere.

now, without knowing much about your field, i can only guess it's like this, only perhaps more so.

also i'm not trying to sound antagonistic, i'm just trying to help, since it took me a bit to discover what i really wanted and how to fight for that, and i felt unsatisfied until then, and given your own "closeted-ness" i suspect you may be in a (somewhat) similar situation (or i could be wrong)

[–]closetanarchist[S] 0 points1 point ago

Not with nuclear; everything nuclear-related is very tightly controlled by the government, given the nature of the materials we work with (radiation monitoring is vital and it's important the standards for monitoring and handling be met). I've worked 4 months in a nuclear power plant and enjoyed it, but I want to do more research instead of just doing procedures to make sure the reactor is operating properly. I'm hoping to do some research at my uni this summer with a professor to get a feel for that sort of path and understand the dynamics of working in a university versus industry. Generally, the utilities and government are backing nuclear research because it's going to produce much more efficient fission technology, which would mean less money loss in an operating plant (current nuclear plants are only about 33% efficient. Labs are working to increase that percentage and some new reactors are extremely promising in having an even higher percentage), so there is funding from corporations because ultimately it would save the corporations more money.

[–]k9pyro 1 point2 points ago

I claim to be a "philosophic anarchist," professing a belief in an anarchist utopia, but outwardly not admitting much more. Despite the fact that it's a useless institution, I feel a real, personal need to get my 4-year college degree, as well as getting a job in the U.S. gov't. I don't think I've been secretive enough on the internet (lol, I'm not using a throwaway on reddit), but I'd like a job in the U.S. foreign service office as my job-while-fighting-the-state. I'm a stupid hypocrite in that regard, but I think I may abandon that for a commune. But for the sake of my potential future as Big Brother/Thought Police, I pretend I'm just a U.S.-Libertarian.

[–]godofwar007 1 point2 points ago

why live in fear? also, you give the government far too much credit. the government does not monitor everything you say on the internet nor does it monitor your every movement. that only happens in hollywood movies. from my experience, as long as you are a trustworthy, innovative researcher with no criminal record you will pass any "background check" for a government lab. if you are going into politics, that's another story.

[–]ImaBlackBelt 1 point2 points ago*

Just by being a vegan you are already contributing more than most in the movement do. As to not being involved in protest, that's what the bandannas are for. They aren't for looking cool, they are so you are unrecognizable in any pictures that may end up floating around of you. I myself have appeared in a couple of publications, but no one will ever know because I always wear my trusty face protection. As for getting possibly arrested, it's usually the boldest in the group that get taken down, and just staying away from the front lines is usually enough to not get arrested. I get pretty lary myself, but I've never been arrested at a protest. My police record and DOJ/FBI also does not indicate that I am involved in the movement at all.

[–]MagonistaRevolt 0 points1 point ago

Just by being a vegan you are already contributing nothing

FTFY. C'mon, get some critical thinking skills.

[–]ImaBlackBelt -1 points0 points ago

Haha, tell that to the ALF and see how far it gets you. By adhering to a vegan diet you do not support the factory farming industry, one of biggest problems facing America today. Those who eat meat and dairy also contribute to the starving of the poor, as the amount of resources poured into raising animals for slaughter drives up the price of food, not to mention if those resources were put towards growing vegetables they could feed many more than they currently do.

Compare this to wearing a bandanna and chanting slogans for a few hours, I think it is obvious to see who makes the bigger impact.

For the record I'm not even vegan and I don't see anything wrong with eating meat you killed or raised yourself.

[–]MagonistaRevolt 0 points1 point ago

By adhering to a vegan diet you do not support the factory farming industry, one of biggest problems facing America today.

You do if you pay taxes. Your money used towards buying meat is only a tiny fraction of what factory farms get from the government in farm subsidy. Also, do you think the supermarket carries less meat or cheese because you stopped eating it? Think again. The supermarket carries meat and cheese for cheap because it's a capitalist racket, and whether or not you consume is of no consequence to those running the racket. As long as you continue to be a good worker and a good producer, they don't give a shit if you starve yourself to death.

Those who eat meat and dairy also contribute to the starving of the poor, as the amount of resources poured into raising animals for slaughter drives up the price of food, not to mention if those resources were put towards growing vegetables they could feed many more than they currently do.

Do you really think we have a lack of food? Meat rots in dumpsters along with all of the other food made by this psychopathic system. It's not a problem of how much food exists, but a problem of distribution inherent in the market system. If everyone ate vegan, there would still be starving people, probably some in your town, let alone across the planet.

[–]BibleBeltAtheist 1 point2 points ago

You sound like you´re on top of your shit. I think you have more to worry with losing yourself than you do with getting outted. So, Don´t fucking lose yourself. Its easy to justify a lot of horrors when you have kids, a morgage, and school debt.

Don´t do any work that would compromise your personal beliefs. Its an easy road to go down.

[–]briesa37 5 points6 points ago

What are you contributing to the world through nuclear research?

[–]Psilocybin_cubensis 5 points6 points ago

Knowledge.

[–]MikeBoda 7 points8 points ago

I can't answer for the OP, but nuclear research is a pretty huge field. Sure, fusion/fission bombs are about the worst technology ever created. Nuclear power is a mixed bag (waste and accident problems are huge negatives, but nuclear power certainly kills less people than coal and might be necessary to provide base-load power as we move to wind and solar). Nuclear medicine is already an important treatment and diagnostic tool and could be further developed to alleviate much suffering. Perhaps most importantly of all, understanding the subatomic helps us understand the universe. Expanding human knowledge in and of itself aught to be something anarchists strive for.

[–]TinfoilFury 1 point2 points ago

Without radioisotope thermoelectric generators, you can forget about space probes. We have no alternative currently.

[–]closetanarchist[S] 2 points3 points ago

Alternative energy. Removing our dependence on fossil fuels, which are horrendous for the environment and monopolize our society. I am actually interested in breeder reactors, which would be a significant power gain increase than our current LWR technology. And of course, satisfying our need to know more about the world around us.

[–]PsyErryDay 5 points6 points ago

It's not nessacery to talk about anarchism until you are in a situation where it matters.

[–]thenoorys 2 points3 points ago

Lay off the down votes people.

[–]kataphract 0 points1 point ago

Anarchists will need you as they will other technically-minded people once they decide to secede.

[–]PANCAKES_FORTHWITH 0 points1 point ago

I live in a conservative, suburban town in the United States. I can only sprinkle my ideas into conversation subtly.

[–]crackiswhackexcept 0 points1 point ago

it's not even safe to give the mild version by calling yourself a socialist around these parts, is it? using the word "anarchist" is a guaranteed way to make sure that pretty much everyone ignores everything you say from that point forward.

[–]HalfdanAsbjorn 0 points1 point ago

I work (or as it happens at the moment am trying to work) in Security. Seems like a bit of a daft roll for someone pro-anarchy but I'm really just doing it because there needs to be someone out there who's just trying to keep people safe and make sure they have a good night. Do I care if people take drugs? No. Do I care if it makes them violent or whatever? Yes. However it would be enough to ensure I never get a job again if they knew my answer to the first of those 2 questions. Security, as far as I'm concerned, shouldn't be about controlling what people are allowed to do, it should be making sure that they can do it without them or anyone else getting hurt. Because I'm not open about my political beliefs as much as (ideally) I'd like to be but I still act on them it means that I've become trusted by not only the employers but also by those I'm hired to protect. That's why I prefer to use jellybabies to stop a fight and then pretend it never happend (but with a warning) than forcibly remove both parties and ruin their night more than they were trying to.

[–]closetotheoath 0 points1 point ago

You're being intelligent. I agree with what others have said: we need as many people as possilbe to be aware and supportive of Anarchism. You must have great skills to be offered a governmental position - we need that kind of commitment that you feel to your job/science. Once again, you're being very, very smart about this. Trying to weave in a little bit of anarchaic thought into conversations with peers/family - that is what most of us do, I imagine.

[–]BibleBeltAtheist 0 points1 point ago

"I understand that this will probably be downvoted"

False

[–]popnlochnessmonster 0 points1 point ago

I am. I'm getting an Economics, BS at a top business school. Unfortunately, I have to stay closeted, but I plan on doing some good things eventually.

[–]tayssir 0 points1 point ago

I recommend the book Disciplined Minds. It's like a self-defense course for professionals who want to act on their values.

There's funny parts, like the chapter about people who successfully pose as professionals, pretending to have formal qualifications...

Particularly appropriate since it's written by an editor at Physics Today, who got fired over writing it, and a public campaign allowed him to win compensation and even symbolically get his job back. ;) (Symbolic because he resigned a few hours later.)

[–]LadyOnAvon 0 points1 point ago

I have been (closeted, that is). Mostly just to maintain cordial relations with people I have to deal with regularly. My background's already flaky enough to scare away leery employers.

How high a clearance will you need? I used to work at a property management company (I know, I know...it was family owned! they were relatively un-evil) where we frequently had feds coming in to ask about former residents. The questions all seemed pretty mild. I was never even put in the position of worrying about hurting an applicant's chances--although it was awfully tempting when asked about a hall of fame bitchy tenant!

For a science/engineering job, I don't think some former roommate mentioning a philosophical anarchist affiliation would matter. You'd have to have been active in ALF or something. I used to do Food Not Bombs with a dude who did some sort of engineering work in an uber-high security building, and was always amazed they "let him in." He said it wasn't something that came up one way or another.

[–]RiotGrrrl585 0 points1 point ago

I don't have some supercool supersecret job or anything, but depending on the circumstance, I'll pull the "libertarian socialist" euphemism, or just talk about stuff and make it known that I don't think that people should be controlled by other people or that people or animals should be raised simply to serve a purpose for the benefit of another, and that if they want to share of themselves, that's cool, but they shouldn't be forced to. Stuff like that.

[–]miketheexpert 0 points1 point ago

study up on martordom.

[–]todhackett 0 points1 point ago

I dropped all of my conservative friends a long time ago. Not because they were conservative, but because they would engage in unethical acts towards others and deny wrongdoing, e.g. vandalism so there hasn't been any need for me to be in the closet. Actually, my professors don't mind either. Some of my liberal friends who are invested in party politics think I am naive. I really wish people understood how creative society could be without coercive institutions.

[–]aletoledo -2 points-1 points ago

Just tell them you're an anarcho-capitalist. Nobody is afraid of us. Voluntarism for the win!

[–]BibleBeltAtheist 3 points4 points ago

haha, Ancap or no, that made me laugh. Here is an upvote.

[–]thelastfolksinger 0 points1 point ago

Nice try, CIA