this post was submitted on
89 points (83% like it)
110 up votes 21 down votes

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own!

all 60 comments

[–]reflectives 38 points39 points ago*

You don't have to trick yourself. I was once in the same state and I broke through it. The more you learn about the world, the more you realize how ridiculous it is and that we could be doing so much better. My breakthrough came when I decided to use my understanding of the problems in the world to be a part of the solution.

I assessed where I was at and what resources I had to work with. I started volunteering some of my free time to worthy causes, meeting other great people. I opened up a community farm and I'm going into my third season. My goal is to be a sustainable model for agriculture. I'm getting more connected with leaders in town because they see that I'm thinking long-term.

My advice is to be a part of the solutions that you see, take time to enjoy the wonderful little things, and live your ideals. We have one life to explore the Earth, people, and ourselves. We also have the ability to help lead things in a better direction. Which direction do you want to go?

This is an excellent interview on meaninglessness and making meaning.

[–]_beeks 14 points15 points ago

This is a great answer. It kind of reminds me of Sartre's "Existentialism is a Humanism."

Sure, there's no point to life, and sure society and its organizations are absurd, but its up to you to find out what's important in this crazy amalgamation of forces and make it more important in your life. The body is corporeal; the memes that you introduce or reinforce into society can be insanely long lasting. But in the end, if you aren't enjoying yourself on this crazy ride you're doing something wrong.

[–]FaustTheBird 5 points6 points ago

This is the answer. Until one has actually tried to have a constructive impact on the world, one cannot understand the world. There are terrible people in power, but that doesn't mean that the only thing we can do is oust them, grovel, or flee. We can build better systems in between the authoritarian power gaps, and it is only this type of activity that will build the pressure in those gaps and actually turn them back.

[–]TedKord 48 points49 points ago

This is what is so disgusting and evil about the world.

That good, intelligent people are so horrified by it - and their inability to do anything about it - that they must censor their minds and shut down portions of their conscience.

What a terrible place.

[–]thecritic06 13 points14 points ago

Oh gawd, my soul in three sentences. :/

[–]goodbible 2 points3 points ago

I simply focus on the good things in my life, and the seldom occurrences of goodness in the world. I do not let these negative things I find on Reddit/Drudgereport/MSNBC/FOXNEWS/etc take my happiness away. I go play disc golf, listen to music I haven't heard in awhile, and try to ensure that my life is filled with positivity.

Currently, I am unemployed, living with my mother, and barely making ends meet, just so you know. Positivity can be done even in the crazy circumstances.

TL;DR: Keep it going, man. Focus on good things. Find time to look up at the sky and remember you are living in a great time.

[–]TedKord 0 points1 point ago

We have all kinds of things going for us that prior generations didn't. If I want to get a drink of water, all I have to do is grab a glass and go to the faucet. If I want to watch or read something entertaining, all I have to do is sit at my computer. I can get medicine, food, clothing, or anything else I need within 10 miles of my home, at relatively low cost. And our projected lifespan is twice of what it was 500 years ago - a blink of an eye in the span of time.

You're right. It's easy to get caught up in the evil of the world. It's just infuriating...this globe could be such a perfect place, and yet we are ruled by money, and men who are themselves ruled by money.

[–]danxmason -4 points-3 points ago

None of that has to do with happiness.

[–]twiggy_trippit 12 points13 points ago

I think you have a bad definition of optimism. Optimism is not about naively believing everything's going to be alright. Optimism is about holding the firm conviction that if we work hard to improve our condition (as individuals or as a community), we can succeed.

Frankly, our era comes with its own huge challenges, but I think we need to look at how far we have come. Ideas like democracy and human rights were marginal a few hundred years ago, while now it's the standard against which we look at everything. I'm thinking of other times and places where I could be living, and being a first-worlder in 2012 is really not the worst that I can think of.

I really wouldn't mind living in pre-colonial Tahiti though. ;)

[–]T_Mucks 14 points15 points ago

I don't think it's that simple - a realistic worldview requires constant examination, which is both exhausting and revealing of the lack of rosy-colored truths.

However, that is not mutually exclusive with optimism: it's often possible to give a perceptive priority to either the more positive or negative aspects. You're more likely to see things in the light that you're looking for.

Think of it this way:

  • Optimist: The Glass is Half Full!
  • Pessimist: the glass is half empty...
  • Realist: The glass is at 50% capacity.

And, just to show how perception skews simple realities:

  • Scientist: The the silica-oxide cylinder contains 50% H20, 50% air by volume.
  • Conspiracy theorist: That glass or the water could be meant to kill you...?
  • Journalist: according to sources, the glass, placed on the table only moments earlier, was reported to contain either alcohol or water. Speculation has arisen that the Governor may have been under the influence at the time. Sources report the glass was not full.
  • Scientologist: the glass emitted a high concentration of theons.
  • Sociologist: let's observe how people interact with the glass and the water.
  • Baptist: Thank the lord for this holy water which we will use to baptize this sinner!
  • Atheist: Can we stop attaching baseless meaning to it and just drink the water?
  • nihilist: The glass is entirely empty - same as everything else.
  • Redditor: Hey guys! Check out this awesome illusion! Is it half full or half empty?

[–]UmberLamp 3 points4 points ago

  • Engineer: The glass is twice as large as it needs to be.

[–]Legitimate_Scientist 0 points1 point ago

The glass is too small.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

Realist here, a nihilist wouldn't care about what's in the glass.

[–]RiotingPacifist 3 points4 points ago

It seams like you are confusing cause and effect and given undue importance to intelligence (especially as IQ is often used in studies about intelligence)

[–]antipoet 1 point2 points ago

This should be the top answer. Tricking yourself into being a depressive realist isn't going to make you smarter.

[–]veridicus 5 points6 points ago*

Upvote for a great question.

I'm a strong believer in not deluding oneself. We live in this world and have to accept what we can and can't control. But perspective matters.

First, it helps me to think of each person and group separate from society at large. Society is often ignorant and slow to change. But there are very smart people doing great things. So while I agree that our societal problems really suck right now, I gain hope by following people and groups I admire. You're not the only one who sees what's wrong.

Second, there's your own world that's somewhat distinct from the entire world. Within your own sphere of influence there's much you can do. Spend some time focusing on those things and you'll gain satisfaction naturally. Stay educated, volunteer, do favors for friends, run for political office, etc.

[–]LeiJun 2 points3 points ago

I cross-posted to /r/BipolarReddit just because of the specific nature of my question. To be fair, I'd like to look at this from both points of view.

Did anyone else smirk after reading this?

Sorry to be tangential, I apologize to not be truly contributing to this post. Let me give it a go.

I've found myself thinking that I can manipulate myself to do whatever i want, which to me is natural thing to learn because in this world is so vast and you can quickly feel how little control you have on anything other than yourself. But on the flip side its hard to know what you really don't know. I find that you must keep exploring, and take time to evaluate and re-evaluate. Find what ideas you believe in and work towards them step by step, little by little, seeing what works and what doesn't. I believe that control over yourself goes a long way you're willing to put in the effort to try. I'm not saying blindly look past the obstacles but if you can see the challenges you should be able to break them down into smaller ones that you can find solutions (hopefully long-term ones) that are worth your efforts and don't require you to 'trick' yourself.

[–]MTUhusky[S] 0 points1 point ago

Hah, didn't even notice I wrote it that way. It made me smirk, too.

Not everyday I unknowingly do something that makes me laugh when I run into it later. Most of the time it's a mistake in some code or something that makes me want to cry instead!

[–]Afaflix 2 points3 points ago

I guess the depression part stems from realizing what this world is coming to and that there is nothing to turn it around.
So, if you can tell yourself "Oh well then, fuck it, let's be happy" ... sure go ahead.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]frenger 1 point2 points ago

Does that include becoming part of the problem? For example, say we're damaging the environment with our excessive consumption and unsustainable ways of living: we can either strive to 'do our bit' and thus rid ourselves of the guilt of what is happening, or we can do what I believe you're suggesting and just relax into the seemingly inevitable and become a part of the problem.

The other point is that you're oversimplifying human nature. Nothing is inevitable: if it was in our nature to destroy ourselves, why have we never done so before? The way I see it, there's exists the tantalising ability within our nature (as you put it) to overcome adversity by clear thinking and teamwork, it's been done before. We just need to somehow rid ourselves of the bad actors in the system that are distracting us, manipulating us, preventing us rectifying societal problems .. though I have no idea how you might do that.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]frenger 0 points1 point ago

Thank you man, that was a good read: you expanded some points which I also think about.

You have to live in some double-think world where, on the one hand you can recognise objectively that humanity is fucked and it's both so mind-bendingly depressing and so gut-wrenchingly inevitable that you want to just spend your life telling people, preaching to them to change their ways (and this is what some people go on to do). .. but on the other hand everyone else seems so happy and distracted by their lives, and there's so much to do and to see in your own life, (and reddit.com is so amusing).. and such it's an easy matter to just forget about all these issues and leave them to somebody else.. that this is what you do. And everyone does. This is human nature, which I guess you were saying above. That is, until you think about them again tomorrow, and repeat the whole process again. Cognitive dissonance is a bitch.

[–]CAT_FACT_BOT -2 points-1 points ago

CAT FACTS:

In Asia and England, black cats are considered lucky.

[–]Afaflix 0 points1 point ago

yeah, I guess. The way I figure it; if you're alive, you're part of the problem .. with exception of a few tribes in the amazon maybe, who don't have a concept of 'possessions'.
The whole 'striving' bit is really just another way of tricking yourself into acceptance. Because you know, it won't make a difference, you just don't feel guilty about it.
This might definitely be a case of oversimplifying it, but really thinking about it would lead to being depressed again ...

http://www.vhemt.org/

[–]frenger 0 points1 point ago

This might definitely be a case of oversimplifying it, but really thinking about it would lead to being depressed again ...

I can certainly sympathise with that. I guess this is part of the human condition.

[–]angrynirritable 3 points4 points ago

Yes, ignorance is bliss, and I don't know how to get there. FML

[–]MTUhusky[S] 0 points1 point ago

I hear you.

People walk around with horse blinders on to block out anything they don't want to see. Makes them happier, yeah? But it also isn't what's actually going on. So to me it's not real.

Sometimes I equate this to drug or alcohol use. You're not really that elated. You don't technically deserve that feeling. It's not real. Alas, they're not the same thing, but it seems like people are just naturally creating selective visual and auditory resistance to negative occurrences just to cope instead of fixing the problems at hand. And oftentimes that means we're just shitting on fellow humans, our planet and its resources, when if we sat down and thought about it, we could probably change some shit around for the better.

Point: Humans don't live up to their potential. As a race we can be pretty fucking retarded sometimes. And that sucks to no end.

[–]angrynirritable 1 point2 points ago

If you are intelligent enough to recognize your insignificance in the grand scheme of things, you recognize that the potential you have is insignificant. Is there a term for the opposite of the dunning-kruger effect? My personal philosophy is that happiness is a situational condition, I find happiness in doing specific things, usually fly fishing a secluded creek. That is not saving the world, that is not living up to my potential, that is a very specific thing that makes me happy. I don't believe can find happiness living up to my potential, or helping others, or trying to save the world, because I know it is mostly in vain. But I can find happiness in that creek.

Do you think the pressure of having to live up to your potential, and constantly worrying about if you are making it, adds or detracts from happiness? It causes unhappiness.

I don't want to be happy, I want to be content, which means accepting things as they are. I think there's some Buddhist philosophy in there.

[–]MTUhusky[S] 0 points1 point ago

Thank-you for your input.

As you, I try to keep things in a zone aimed at content. Constant happiness or bliss isn't something I want to attempt maintaining; it sets the bar so high that the only way to go from there is down. It's not realistically achievable.

I have an issue keeping a cool-collective attitude from day-to-day. Some days I'm overly happy and other days I'm pissy and upset. My philosophy is on par with yours. But my brain chemistry does not cooperate.

My goal is to set or define a 'normal', then try to push toward it each day regardless of what side of the bed I find myself on in the morning. The definition of normal is what I'm trying to move toward figuring out with this post...and so far, quite a bit of good information has been provided.

[–]angrynirritable 1 point2 points ago

Your normal is the equivalent of my being content. It's acceptance without happiness or being despondent. I find happiness in moments, normal is more along the lines of simply enduring. My brain chemistry doesn't cooperate either, 8 yrs of meds and I've given up, now I just try to make the most of the moments. While I think this may be a workable solution for me, it was not a workable solution for my marriage of 15 yrs. Also a pain in the ass when you have to be all sunshine and rainbows in the corporate world when inside you know everything is a sham.

[–]Navi_to_the_rescue 0 points1 point ago

Ignorance is bliss as long as someone else is taking care of us, parenting us, coddling us. Otherwise, ignorance is misery, because it renders us incapable.

[–]danxmason -1 points0 points ago

Slightly intelligent people figure out how to be depressed. Very intelligent people figure out how to be happy.

[–]DatsYoAss 18 points19 points ago

That's an incredibly patronizing and egocentric statement. An increase in personal happiness is not a function of intelligence. While there may be a correlation between intelligence and objective observation of contributing factors to depression, behavior and emotion are not metrics of intelligence.

[–]kryptobs2000 3 points4 points ago

Neither is intelligence a metric for happiness, it has to be one way or the other, there is no reason to believe there is a causual factor behind it. There's plenty of happy intelligent people and plenty of depressed eh.. slow, people.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]pkbooo -1 points0 points ago

depression is conquerable through your intelligence by getting proper treatment.

Professional treatment is helpful but not perfect. There are people who sincerely want to get better and seek out all available resources to improve their condition, but we don't know enough about mental illness, including depression, to cure things 100% of the time.

If you fail to even detect your own change of mood, then I think you are severely lacking some crucial areas that might not be linked to IQ, which I highly doubt, since most people would notice this unless they're retarded.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy works by making a person aware of their distorted thought processes so that they can change their irrational thoughts and behaviors. It doesn't work for everyone, though (DBT, for example, shows more success in certain areas).

I am fully aware of my thoughts and my moods. I look at the external world and the guidance of medical professionals to assess whether or not my thoughts are rational. The problem is, my thoughts are rational; it's my mood that is the problem. Being aware of one's thoughts and mood is not all it takes to treat depression or other mental illness.

intelligent people don't stay depressed they figure it out and become happy or something close to it.

This is offensively ignorant. Many brilliant people have struggled with depression or other mental illness. Depression is not a sign of a lack of intelligence, it's a chemical imbalance that makes it (in many cases) impossible to overcome with willpower alone. Depression doesn't discriminate--it can affect anyone, regardless of situation or intelligence.

I would encourage you to learn more about mental illness and clinical depression, because many things you have said are objectively false. The Brain and Behavior Research Foundation is a good place to start. It also wouldn't hurt to read the resources provided under the "more information" section.

[–]DatsYoAss -1 points0 points ago

I'm sorry but you don't understand what Clinical Depression is.

Just a friendly heads up for future social interactions, bragging about having a high IQ makes you look silly. So does poor grammar.

[–]_Woodrow_ 1 point2 points ago

Emotional Intelligence is a huge piece of being a well-rounded individual. Something you seem to overlook.

[–]DatsYoAss -1 points0 points ago

Emotional experience cannot be artificially objectified in order to be made amenable to IQ - style testing.

[–]_Woodrow_ 0 points1 point ago

What does IQ testing have to do with actual intelligence?

[–]DatsYoAss 1 point2 points ago

  • IQ tests measures how much knowledge you have and your ability to reason, and then compares that to your age to determine your rate of learning and speed of thinking as compared to the majority. Therefore, IQ measures actual intelligence but not how that intelligence is used.

  • Emotional Intelligence-Very intelligent people figure out how to be happy- Putting a number on our emotional intelligence is impossible. Our emotional reactions to any given situation are rooted in the context of the event -- factors like how well we know the people involved, the impact of the event on our lives, even the kind of day we're having. To try to measure such a response in a laboratory setting isn't feasible.

[–]_Woodrow_ 0 points1 point ago

So, what are you saying? That the inability to quantify and measure it somehow negates it's importance?

[–]DatsYoAss 0 points1 point ago

No, the inability to objectivity quantify invalidates the notion of EI or EQ entirely.

[–]erez27 1 point2 points ago

I have managed to substantially increase my "emotional intelligence" with some time and effort, a feat I don't think I could ever reproduce with IQ.

[–]_Woodrow_ 1 point2 points ago

you learned, just like you did in grade school

[–]erez27 0 points1 point ago

I can't prove it one way or the other, but I'm confident that grade school was not a factor in any positive change of my IQ.

[–]erez27 0 points1 point ago

tl;dr they created a short-term IQ boost and a long-term non-IQ boost, and this in disadvantaged children that probably just weren't living to their full potential in the first place.

Thank you for taking the time to provide a link, but it did not affect my impression.

[–]danxmason 0 points1 point ago

Finding and learning how to adopt coping skills, behaviour modification, and discovering emotional triggers are all based off of insight and utility. Someone who is sad and wants to be happy but has never done the research or implemented ways to resolve it are not intelligent. They just think they are.

You're right that behaviour and emotion are not metrics of intelligence since some people prefer to be depressed.

[–]tomkzinti 2 points3 points ago

Daaaaaayum, that's a Troll Of The Year comment if I ever saw one!

[–]MTUhusky[S] 0 points1 point ago

This resonates with me. It's why I'm studying neuroscience and psychology in my spare time. Sick of waiting, it's time to get to the bottom of what's up. And then conquer it.

[–]danxmason 0 points1 point ago

You are on the right path.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]frenger 1 point2 points ago

I don't think it's as black and white as you're making out.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]frenger 0 points1 point ago

Actually, now I understand what you meant, sorry. I actually thought you meant the opposite, as in "if you're depressed, you're not trying hard enough", and I know that it is more complicated than that in reality. Your clarification shows that you meant the opposite to what I took you to mean..

[–]kryptobs2000 0 points1 point ago

Not saying it's so simple, but I think a lot of depressed people do try to hard, myself included for awhile. Sometimes you need to sit back, realize what you have and appreciate what you can do with it. The world does suck in a lot of ways, but you have to start somewhere, if there were nothing wrong at all you may sit around and complain how there is nothing to do anymore.

[–]BadListener 1 point2 points ago

you clearly don't understand depression.

[–]kryptobs2000 0 points1 point ago

Perhaps you don't understand happiness?

[–]kagayaki 1 point2 points ago

Two cliches/sayings come to mind:

"Ignorance is bliss"

"Life is what you make of it"

While I'm not bipolar, I still kind of feel what you mean. Every time I go to work I go through the same type of thing, although it might not be quite as exaggerated. I was in a REAL good mood yesterday, until I went to work. I mean, it's almost as if clocking in worked as a switch that put me in a bad mood. About an hour into my shift I started trying to cheer myself up.. or at least tried to get myself out of the stupor I was in. Was I manipulating myself? Ignoring things I shouldn't have? I suppose I was doing both of those things, but the only thing we really have the power over is the way we interpret things. I could be pissed as hell that I'm 30 working at Walmart and have to work with a bunch of 20 year olds who seem to display little to no work ethic or responsibility for their job. It's not my responsibility to be responsible for them so while my first instinct may be to point out that the department hasn't been zoned at all in the last three hours, I know that trying to act like someone's boss even though I'm not won't be good for either one of us.

I have the feeling that beyond anything else, to some extent, humans are empathetic creatures. Our baser instincts may be that of greed and lust, but to put it another way -- if you unequivocally act like an ass to someone they will probably act like an ass to you too. I'm definitely not as trusting of people as I used to be, even though a part of me wants to connect with other people to an extent that I wish I was more open.

I've already pasted two quotes, why not 3?

“Lord grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.”

Whether or not you believe in God (I don't), the sentiment is the same. America might be a political clusterfuck and its politicians are for sale to the highest bidder, but there's very little any one person can do to affect things. Your job might suck. You might need to lose 60lbs. Your social circle might be full of superficial assholes. You might not have a social circle (that's me). But all of those things are not equal in terms of how you can affect change, so it's my feeling that they shouldn't necessarily affect your outlook the same.

I guess this is my outlook and I'll stop rambling: it's important to be mindful of how things could or should be changed or improved, but if it's something you can't play a meaningful role in changing.. it's counterproductive to lose sleep over it. What you have the most power over is how you interpret things you experience in your life; it's your choice to view something as positive, negative, or something in between. 9 times out of 10, things are neither completely positive nor negative -- they're something in between. I don't consider myself unintelligent, but I'm also definitely also not a depressive realistic. This also does not mean I'm not cognizant of the fucked up things that go on around me.

[–]thesorrow312 0 points1 point ago

Ignorance is bliss. You need to be brave to get out of the cave.

[–]mushinron 0 points1 point ago

Hi MTUhusky. I am a non-bipolar with a deep interest in the condition due to a close friend having it. It strikes me that you are trying to make decisions at a level of generalization that make it difficult to make judgements. Any discussion of human interactions is in essence decision making under uncertainty, and the information loss due to generalization makes this decision making under almost perfect uncertainty. I would recommend that you change to a sharper focus. I think that you will agree that humans are social animals that in part find meaning (e.g. derive some satisfaction) through interactions with others. While there are a small percentage of introverts for which this may not fully apply, assuming you are not an introvert, you are left with the question of how you build your community and interact with those outside your direct community to maximize your personal satisfaction. In this case, you are not trying to identify who is a wolf and who is a sheep, or choosing yourself which to be, but rather judging each interaction on its own, adapting your own behavior to match your expectations of your counterparts based on their history of behavior with you. In the case of the shady mechanic, it is natural for you to to be the defensive, unfriendly, negative outlook individual, and work to minimize interaction. In the case of your smart, entertaining neighbor, you can be the empathetic and optimistic friend. You may find that they have other friends that are of a similar nature, expanding your community of quality individuals. For strangers, you can take the look-and-see neutral approach. While this does not remove risk, you are making decisions based on actual interaction data. Wishing you the best from Tokyo.

[–]erez27 1 point2 points ago

Reality is depressing only if you dwell on it emotionally. I think it's dumber to choose one "personality" and stick with it. Set aside time for serious critical thinking, to explore new ideas and make important decisions. The rest of the time, focus on being happy, experience the present without worries (actively refuse to engage problems or deep thoughts unless you must), and recharge yourself emotionally and mentally. It's not a waste of time either; your brain is silently still thinking in the background, weeding out wrong ideas, creating new connections between established ideas, etc.

I don't mean to preach, and this approach may not work for you, but it works for me. Ever since I started practicing it, my life improved in all aspects. I'm happier, and that means I have more energy to explore the world and to think, and also the ideas from my happy mindset bring an interesting dimension to my thinking that I used to ignore.

I fondly call this approach Doublethink.

[–]avd007 0 points1 point ago

ignorance is bliss. but it doesn't mean being ignorant is good for anyone other than yourself.